FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ALBAUGH & CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR (No.2) | [2008] FMCAfam 851 |
| CHILD SUPPORT – Unsuccessful child support departure prohibition application – costs order made. |
| Family Law Act 1975 Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 |
| Applicant: | MR ALBAUGH |
| Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| File Number: | SYC 7376 of 2007 |
| Judgment of: | Sexton FM |
| Hearing date: | 22 July 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 13 August 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | In person |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Australian Government Solicitors |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The Applicant father pay the costs of the Child Support Registrar in relation to his appeal from a Departure Prohibition Order in the sum of $4,160, such sum to be paid by the father to the solicitors for the Child Support Registrar within 3 calendar months of today’s date.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Albaugh & Child Support Registrar is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 7376 of 2007
| MR ALBAUGH |
Applicant
And
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an application for costs by the Child Support Registrar, the respondent in an appeal brought by the applicant father in relation to a Departure Prohibition Order. The appeal was heard on 11 December 2007 and judgment delivered on 13 December 2007. At the hearing of the appeal, the father sought to have the Departure Prohibition Order set aside. The appeal was dismissed. By agreement, the hearing of the respondent’s application for costs of the appeal was adjourned until after the hearing of the father’s application for departure from a number of child support agency assessments. Those proceedings were finalised on 18 June 2008 by Federal Magistrate Baumann. The orders provide for the father to pay child support at a rate of $200 a month between 11 August 2006 and 11 August 2008, and from 11 August 2008 until 30 June 2009 at a rate of $350 a month.
The respondent seeks an order that the applicant pay its costs of the appeal in the sum of $4,160, calculated in accordance with Schedule 1 of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules. The applicant opposes the application.
Ms Hawkins, solicitor for the Child Support Registrar, submits that the applicant should pay the costs of the appeal because the applicant was wholly unsuccessful in the appeal, the applicant has the capacity to pay and because the father has ignored the Court orders of Federal Magistrate Baumann of 18 June 2008, and the father has made no effort to reduce his arrears of child support or to meet his child support obligations for a number of years.
Relevant Law
In accordance with s.117(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 the usual rule in family law proceedings is that each party pay his/her own costs. However, s.117(2) provides that the court may order costs if it is of the opinion that there are circumstances that justify it in doing so,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Albaugh & Child Support Registrar (No.2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FMCAfam 851
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Departure Prohibition Order was properly issued under the relevant legislation and if the father's rights under the Australian Constitution were being unduly infringed. The court had to determine whether the order was justified and whether there were any procedural irregularities in its issuance. Additionally, the court considered whether the order was proportionate to the objectives it sought to achieve.
The Family Court found that the Departure Prohibition Order was correctly issued under the Family Law Act and that it did not unduly infringe upon the father’s constitutional rights. The court held that the order was a necessary measure to ensure compliance with child support obligations and that the Registrar had acted within their statutory powers. The court rejected the father's arguments, emphasising the importance of enforcing child support obligations to protect the interests of the child. Consequently, the father's appeal against the order was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay the costs of the Child Support Registrar.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Applicant father pay the costs of the Child Support Registrar in relation to his appeal from a Departure Prohibition Order in the sum of $4,160, such sum to be paid by the father to the solicitors for the Child Support Registrar within 3 calendar months of today’s date.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.