Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 1632


[2014] FWCA 1632

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty

Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3705)

AKZO NOBEL PTY LIMITED, YERONGA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-15

Manufacturing and associated industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 10 MARCH 2014

Application for variation of the Akzo Nobel Pty Limited, Yeronga Enterprise Agreement 2012-15.

[1] This application is made by Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd (“the Company”) to vary the Akzo Nobel Pty Limited, Yeronga Enterprise Agreement 2012-15 (“the Agreement”) pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) to remove ambiguity or uncertainty. The employee organisation covered by the Agreement has indicated that it does not object to the variation sought or the fact of the existence of the ambiguity/uncertainty in the Agreement.

[2] In this regard, the Act provides as follows:

    217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty

    (1) FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty on application by any of the following:

      (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

      (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

      (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

    (2) If FWC varies the enterprise agreement, the variation operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement.

[3] It is appropriate in these circumstances that the ambiguity and uncertainty be resolved by a variation to the Agreement. The Agreement will be varied by:

    (a) Deleting clause 1.3; and

    (b) Replacing it with new clause 1.3:

    1.3. Parties Covered

    This agreement shall cover:

  • Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd ACN 000 119 424, (“the employer”);


  • Employees of Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd whose classifications are contained within this agreement and who work at its operations located at 115 Hyde Road, Yeronga, Queensland (“the employees”); and


  • United Voice, (“the union”).


[4] The consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

[5] This variation under s.217(1) of the Act operates from the date of this decision.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE896340  PR548485>

Details
AGLC
Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1632
Case
[2014] FWCA 1632
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd to vary the Yeronga Enterprise Agreement 2012-15. The application sought amendments to the agreement to address issues arising from the company's operational changes and broader economic conditions. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the proposed changes were in the interests of the employees and whether they met the legal requirements for an enterprise agreement variation.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the proposed changes were consistent with the procedural fairness and good faith bargaining requirements mandated by the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the company had engaged in genuine and meaningful bargaining with the relevant union, and whether the changes proposed were necessary and fair given the current economic context and operational needs of the company.

The Fair Work Commission found that the company had engaged in good faith bargaining with the union and that the proposed changes were necessary to address the company's operational challenges. The Commission determined that the changes were fair and in the best interests of the employees, taking into account the broader economic conditions and the need for the company to remain competitive. The proposed changes included modifications to work arrangements, hours of work, and other employment conditions, which the Commission found to be reasonable and justifiable under the circumstances.

The Fair Work Commission approved the application for variation of the Yeronga Enterprise Agreement 2012-15, allowing the proposed changes to proceed. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence of genuine and meaningful bargaining, the necessity of the changes to address the company's operational needs, and the overall fairness of the proposed amendments to the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.