Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Trading AS Akubra Hats

Case [2025] FWCA 3038


[2025] FWCA 3038

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Trading AS Akubra Hats

(AG2025/2803)

AKUBRA HATS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Textile industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SLEVIN

SYDNEY, 29 SEPTEMBER 2025

Application for approval of the Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made by Akubra Hats Pty Ltd  (Applicant) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 (Agreement). The Application is made pursuant to s. 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. The Commission must approve the agreement if the requirements in ss. 186 and 187 of the Act are met.

  1. Section 186(2)(c) requires that the terms of the Agreement do not exclude any provision of the National Employment Standards (NES). Clause 8.3 of the Agreement is an NES precedence clause.

  1. A concern was raised that clause 37.1 of the Agreement relating whether periods of leave count as ordinary working hours for the purpose of calculation of overtime entitlements. I received submissions from both the Applicant and the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) which was a bargaining representative for the Agreement.

  1. Section 62 of the Act deals with maximum hourly hours of work. Subsection 62(4) provides that for the purpose of calculating weekly hours of work the hours an employee works in a week are taken to include any hours of leave, or absence, whether paid or unpaid, applies to the calculation of hoors worked. Given clause 8.3, clause 37.1 of the Agreement cannot be applied in a manner contrary to s. 62 by permitting for the exclusion of leave when reckoning weekly hours.

  1. Sections 186(2)(d) requires the Commission to be satisfied the agreement passes the better off overall test (BOOT). The test is found in s.193 of the Act and it is to be applied in accordance with s. 193A.

  1. Concerns were raised with the Applicant as to whether the Agreement passed the BOOT. In response, the Applicant has provided undertakings. 

  2. A copy of the undertakings is attached (Annexure A). In accordance with s. 190(4) of the Act the views of the bargaining representatives for the agreement were sought about the undertakings. No objection was raised. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. 

  1. Having regard to the undertakings, the submissions made, and the material contained in the application and filed in relation to it, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186 and 187 are met.  

  1. The CFMEU has given notice under s. 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s. 201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the CFMEU.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 29 September 2025 and will operate in accordance with Clause 5 of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2027

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530379  PR791555>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Trading AS Akubra Hats [2025] FWCA 3038
Case
[2025] FWCA 3038
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Akubra Hats Pty Ltd, trading as Akubra Hats, sought approval for the Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 from the Fair Work Commission. The agreement aimed to regulate employment terms and conditions for employees within the company. The dispute primarily revolved around whether the agreement complied with the relevant legislative requirements and provided fair terms for the employees.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the statutory criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was a "registered agreement" and if it contained the minimum terms and conditions as specified by the Act. Furthermore, the Commission considered whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees or their representatives, and if it provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement substantially complied with the statutory requirements for a registered agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement contained all the required minimum terms and conditions and was consistent with the legislative framework. Consequently, the Commission approved the Akubra Hats Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025, marking it as a registered agreement.

The Commission's decision was based on the evidence presented and the statutory criteria for approval. The Commission's approval ensures that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement are enforceable and that the employees are protected under the Fair Work Act 2009. The approval of the agreement reflects the Commission's commitment to facilitating fair and effective bargaining between employers and employees while upholding the legislative framework.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.