Legal Research
Cases
Ah Fook v TAC

Ah Fook v TAC

Case [2021] VCC 1518

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Ah Fook v TAC [2021] VCC 1518
Case: [2021] VCC 1518
Decision Date: 15 October 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Ah Fook v TAC [2021] VCC 1518

Most Recent Citation

Ah Fook v Transport Accident Commission [2022] VSCA 199

Cases Citing This Decision

Ah Fook v Transport Accident Commission [2022] VSCA 199
Citation 1 (Para 4)

…ant’s impairment consequences could not be considered ‘more than significant or marked’.[2] [1] Ah Fook v Transport Accident Commission [2021] VCC 1518 (‘Reasons’). [2]Ibid [2], [9], [38] and [60]–[62]. See also Humphries v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129, 140.…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Haidar v Transport Accident Commission [2016] VSCA 182
Citation 1

…Cited: Transport Accident Commission v Zepic (2013) 65 MVR 32; Richards v Wylie (2000) 1 VR 79; Humphries & Anor v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129; Haidar v Transport Accident Commission (2016) 77 MVR 121; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd (2007) 17 VR 592; Dressing v Porter [2006] VSCA 215; Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v…
Transport Accident Commission v Zepic [2013] VSCA 232
Citation 2

…it – impairment consequences – retained capacity Legislation Cited: Transport Accident Act 1988 (Vic); Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) Cases Cited: Transport Accident Commission v Zepic (2013) 65 MVR 32; Richards v Wylie (2000) 1 VR 79; Humphries & Anor v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129; Haidar v Transport Accident Commission (2016) 77 MVR 121; Mobilio v Ball…
Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso [2010] VSCA 12
Citation 3

…iotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd (2007) 17 VR 592; Dressing v Porter [2006] VSCA 215; Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso [2010] VSCA 12 Judgment: Application dismissed…
Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 267
Citation 4

…2] 2 VR 129; Haidar v Transport Accident Commission (2016) 77 MVR 121; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd (2007) 17 VR 592; Dressing v Porter [2006] VSCA 215; Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso [2010] VSCA 12 Judgment: Application dismissed…
Dressing v Porter [2006] VSCA 215
Citation 5

…dent Commission (2016) 77 MVR 121; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd (2007) 17 VR 592; Dressing v Porter [2006] VSCA 215; Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso [2010] VSCA 12 Judgment: Application dismissed…
Richards v Wylie [2000] VSCA 50
Citation 6

…tion Cited: Transport Accident Act 1988 (Vic); Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) Cases Cited: Transport Accident Commission v Zepic (2013) 65 MVR 32; Richards v Wylie (2000) 1 VR 79; Humphries & Anor v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129; Haidar v Transport Accident Commission (2016) 77 MVR 121; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Kelso v Tati…
Barlow v Hollis [2000] VSCA 26
Citation 7

…port Accident Act 1988 (Vic); Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) Cases Cited: Transport Accident Commission v Zepic (2013) 65 MVR 32; Richards v Wylie (2000) 1 VR 79; Humphries & Anor v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129; Haidar v Transport Accident Commission (2016) 77 MVR 121; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Kelso v Tatiara Meat…

AI Chat coming soon