| [2020] FWCA 2247 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
AgriExchange Pty Ltd
(AG2020/988)
VITOR CITRUS PACKHOUSE AGREEMENT 2020-2024
Agricultural industry | |
COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 30 APRIL 2020 |
Application for approval of the Vitor Citrus Packhouse Agreement 2020-2024.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Vitor Citrus Packhouse Agreement 2020-2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by AgriExchange Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 16 April 2020.
[3] On 20 April 2020, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.
[4] The Applicant submitted a form F17 Statutory Declaration which did not have the signature properly witnessed. In accordance with rule 6 of the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013 (the Rules), and the Statement issued by the Fair Work Commission on 31 March 2020 relating to the COVID-19 response, I consider it appropriate to dispense with the Rules and accept the signed declaration.
[5] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 28 April 2020. The undertaking deals with the following topics:
• Clauses 25.4 and 25.10(d) of the Agreement will not have effect.
• The rates of pay in Schedule A will apply from the commencement of the Agreement.
• A trainee under clause 14.3(b) of the Agreement will be paid the minimum applicable rate under the Horticulture Award 2010 plus $0.25 per hour.
• The reference in Schedule C clause 4.1 of the Agreement to ‘relevant minimum wage’ is a reference to the rates in Schedule A of the Agreement.
• The minimum payment under Schedule C clause 4.2 of the Agreement will be $100 per week.
• If a level 6 employee is required to act as a Leading Hand for 7 or more employees, they will be paid $22.14, for 11-20 employees $22.44 and for more than 20 employees $22.70.
• Further to clause 24.1(a), an employee can elect at the commencement of their shift to take a meal break 5 hours after the commencement of work.
[6] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.
[7] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[8] As the Agreement does not contain a flexibility term which meets the requirements of s.203 of the Act, the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[9] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[10] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[11] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 1 January 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507927 PR718690>
- AGLC
- AgriExchange Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 2247
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 2247
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable, taking into account various factors, including the nature of the work, the bargaining positions of the parties, and the overall impact on the employees. Additionally, the court had to ensure that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage any group of employees or contravene any provisions of the Fair Work Act. The analysis involved a detailed examination of the specific terms of the agreement, such as wages, hours of work, leave provisions, and other employment conditions.
After a thorough examination of the agreement, the court found that the Vitor Citrus Packhouse Agreement 2020-2024 met the criteria for approval. The terms were considered fair and reasonable, as they provided adequate protection for the employees and were in line with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was approved, and the parties were directed to take all necessary steps to implement it. The decision underscored the importance of ensuring that employment agreements provide fair and reasonable terms for workers while balancing the interests of employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.