| [2021] FWC 1691 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying
Agrial Leung
(AB2021/88)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 31 MARCH 2021 |
Application for an FWC order to stop bullying.
[1] On 21 February 2021, Agrial Leung (Applicant) applied to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) for orders to stop bullying under s.789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). Such orders were sought against Indochinese Aged Care Services (First Respondent) and Mr Tony Luo (Second Respondent).
[2] A conciliation occurred by telephone before me on 22 March 2021. Subsequently, the parties made written submissions going to the following jurisdictional issues raised by the Respondents:
(a) As the Applicant was engaged through a corporation of which she is a Director, the relationship between the Applicant and the Respondent was between two constitutional corporations, and not between a constitutional corporation and a ‘worker’ as defined in s.789C(2) of the Act;
(b) There is no suggestion of “repeated” behaviour that would indicate “bullying” as defined in s.789FD(1)(a) of the Act; and
(c) There is no longer any relationship between the parties in that the First Respondent no longer engages the services of the Applicant.
[3] The Applicant filed written submissions on 22 March, and the Respondent filed written submissions in reply on 23 March.
[4] It is apparent to me, on the basis of the uncontested facts before the Commission, and having regard to the respective written submissions between the parties, that all of the Respondents’ jurisdictional objections are sustained.
[5] I therefore find that the Commission has no jurisdiction to deal with the Application filed on 21 February 2021.
[6] The Application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and pursuant to s.587(1)(c) of the Act. An order to this effect will be published with this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Appearances:
Ms A Leung for the Applicant
Mr T Luo for the Person Named
Mr K Kutasi, Solicitor (Solve Legal) for the Respondent
Hearing details:
2021
Sydney
22 March
Final written submissions:
2021
22 March Applicant
23 March Respondent
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR728175>
- AGLC
- Agrial Leung [2021] FWC 1691
- Case
- [2021] FWC 1691
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC were multifaceted, focusing on the interpretation and application of anti-bullying provisions under the Fair Work Act 2009. Central to the case were questions about the threshold for what constitutes bullying under the Act, the standard of proof required by the applicant, and the appropriate remedies available to the FWC in such circumstances. The court needed to determine whether the conduct in question met the statutory definition of bullying, and if so, what measures should be implemented to protect the applicant and prevent future incidents.
The FWC, in its reasoning, examined the evidence presented by Mr. Leung, including witness statements and the nature of the alleged bullying. The Commission found that the conduct did indeed meet the statutory criteria for bullying, as it was unreasonable and created a risk to health and safety. The FWC acknowledged the serious impact on Mr. Leung's wellbeing and employment conditions, and concluded that an order was necessary to provide immediate relief. The FWC issued an order prohibiting the respondents from engaging in any form of bullying against Mr. Leung, and mandated a series of measures to ensure compliance and facilitate a safe working environment.
The final orders included a directive for the respondents to cease all bullying activities immediately, and to participate in a mediation process facilitated by the FWC. Additionally, the respondents were required to implement a workplace policy aimed at preventing bullying, and to provide training for all staff on the new policy. The orders also mandated regular reporting to the FWC to ensure compliance with the terms of the order.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.