FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agombar & Ermans [2021] FCCA 1842
File number: MLC 2591 of 2020 Judgment of: JUDGE O'SHANNESSY Date of judgment: 11 August 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – section 102NA – cross-examination of parties scheme – where father seeks representation under section 102NA – where mandatory provisions do not apply – courts discretion – orders made Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss 102NA, 102NB Cases cited: Middleton & Redmond [2021] FCCA 316
Owen & Owen [2020] FamCA 90
Number of paragraphs: 19 Date of hearing: 18 November 2020 Place: Melbourne The Applicant: Appeared In Person Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D Carne Solicitor for the Respondent: Ryan Carlisle Thomas ORDERS
MLC 2591 of 2020 BETWEEN: MR AGOMBAR
Applicant
AND: MS ERMANS
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE O'SHANNESSY
DATE OF ORDER:
18 NOVEMBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The final hearing listed to commence on 30 November 2020 be vacated.
2.Pursuant to section 102NA(1)(c)(iv) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ("the Act"), section 102NA(2) of the Act applies to any future cross-examination in these proceedings and IT IS REQUESTED THAT Victoria Legal Aid provide assistance to the Applicant under the cross-examination scheme.
3.The proceedings be adjourned to 2 June 2021 at 10.00am for Final Hearing before Judge McGuire (with an estimated hearing time of two days) at the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Melbourne.
4.The party responsible for the payment of any fee including a setting down or hearing fee pay or cause to be paid such of the fees as shall be payable by that party in accordance with, and within the time specified in, the Family Law (Fees) Regulation 2012.
AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:
A.Pursuant to order 2 hereof, the Applicant do all acts and things necessary to make an application to Victoria Legal Aid for funding under the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross Examination of Parties Scheme to enable his legal representation at Final Hearing.
B.The relevant application referred to in Notation A hereof is available to the parties at 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Agombar & Ermans is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JUDGE O’SHANNESSY
BACKGROUND
On 18 November 2021 I made an order pursuant to section 102NA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (‘the Act’) and reserved my reasons. These are those reasons. These proceedings concern the child X who is now aged 8. The Applicant Father is Mr Agombar (‘the Father’) and the Respondent Mother is Ms Ermans (‘the Mother’).
The issue that came before me on 18 November 2020 was solely whether a section 102NA of the Act order should be made preventing the Father from cross-examination pursuant to the scheme of that section. The matter was…
Continue reading Agombar & Ermans
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Agombar & Ermans [2021] FCCA 1842
- Case
- [2021] FCCA 1842
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was how to accommodate the Applicant's desire for representation under the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross Examination of Parties Scheme, while simultaneously ensuring the final hearing, scheduled to commence on 30 November 2020, was not prejudiced. This presented a conflict between the Applicant's need for funding and the court's need to manage its list.
Judge O'Shannessy determined that the requirements of section 102NA(1)(c)(iv) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) were satisfied, exercising discretion to apply section 102NA(2) of the Act. This provision prohibits parties from cross-examining each other personally. Consequently, the court requested Victoria Legal Aid to provide assistance to the Applicant under the cross-examination scheme, thereby facilitating his legal representation at the final hearing. The proceedings were adjourned for a final hearing on 2 June 2021. The court also noted that Victoria Legal Aid had since advised that the Applicant had been appointed representation under the scheme.
Orders
Orders of the court
MLC 2591 of 2020
BETWEEN:
MR AGOMBAR
Applicant
AND:
MS ERMANS
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE O'SHANNESSY
DATE OF ORDER:
18 NOVEMBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The final hearing listed to commence on 30 November 2020 be vacated.
2. Pursuant to section 102NA(1)(c)(iv) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ("the Act"), section 102NA(2) of the Act applies to any future cross-examination in these proceedings and IT IS REQUESTED THAT Victoria Legal Aid provide assistance to the Applicant under the cross-examination scheme.
3. The proceedings be adjourned to 2 June 2021 at 10.00am for Final Hearing before Judge McGuire (with an estimated hearing time of two days) at the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Melbourne.
4. The party responsible for the payment of any fee including a setting down or hearing fee pay or cause to be paid such of the fees as shall be payable by that party in accordance with, and within the time specified in, the Family Law (Fees) Regulation 2012.
AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:
A. Pursuant to order 2 hereof, the Applicant do all acts and things necessary to make an application to Victoria Legal Aid for funding under the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross Examination of Parties Scheme to enable his legal representation at Final Hearing.
B. The relevant application referred to in Notation A hereof is available to the parties at https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-answers/commonwealth-family-violence-and-cross-examination-of-parties-scheme.
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.