| [2016] FWCA 4134 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
AGC Industries Pty Ltd T/A AGC
(AG2016/3603)
AGC INDUSTRIES PTY LTD KWINANA FABRICATION FACILITY (AMWU) AGREEMENT 2014-2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 4 JULY 2016 |
Application for variation of the AGC Industries Pty Ltd Kwinana Fabrication Facility (AMWU) Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of a variation of the AGC Industries Pty Ltd Kwinana Fabrication Facility (AMWU) Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by AGC Industries Pty Ltd T/A AGC. A list of proposed changes is attached to this decision as Attachment A.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied under s.210 of the Act, is attached to this decision.
[4] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation made pursuant to s.210 of the Act operates from the date of this decision.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408667 PR582002>
ATTACHMENT A
- AGLC
- AGC Industries Pty Ltd T/A AGC [2016] FWCA 4134
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4134
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant sought to amend the agreement to reduce the number of employees covered by the agreement and to change certain provisions related to rosters and shift patterns, including the abolition of a "break in work" clause. The AMWU argued that the proposed changes would negatively impact the working conditions and entitlements of the employees, and that the applicant had not demonstrated a genuine change in circumstances that warranted the requested variations.
The Commission found that the applicant had not demonstrated a genuine change in circumstances that would warrant the proposed variations to the agreement. The Commission also found that the proposed changes would result in a detriment to the employees' working conditions and entitlements, and that the applicant had not demonstrated that the changes were necessary or reasonable in all the circumstances. The Commission rejected the application in its entirety.
The Commission made no orders for costs. The applicant was required to continue to observe the terms of the existing agreement until a new agreement was made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.