FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agambar & Agambar [2021] FCCA 1113
File number(s): BRC 8532 of 2019 Judgment of: JUDGE VASTA Date of judgment: 4 May 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – where Final Consent Orders were made in 2019 - where an issue arose in the exercise of parental responsibility upon which the parents could not agree and thus requires judicial determination– where a child has launched action for compensation against his mother from a motor vehicle accident that is subject to a compulsory third party claim - where the child sustained serious and ongoing medical issues – where the mother is a defendant – where the mother is precluded from exercising equal parental responsibility – where it is not in the best interest of the child for the father to exercise default sole parental responsibility – whether an independent person should be in charge of the management of the claim – where a litigation guardian cannot be involved in preliminary matters prior to litigation officially commencing - whether it is appropriate to grant the independent person sole parental responsibility for this very narrow aspect Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 64C, 65P
Motor Accident Insurance Act1994 s 52
Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 1999 r 94
Number of paragraphs: 55 Date of last submission/s: 4 May 2021 Date of hearing: 4 May 2021 Place: Brisbane Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Firth Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Arnold ORDERS
BRC 8532 of 2019 BETWEEN: MS AGAMBAR
Applicant
AND: MR AGAMBAR
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE VASTA
DATE OF ORDER:
4 MAY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS:
1.That Mr B be joined to these proceedings.
2.That pursuant to section 64C of the Family Law Act 1975, Mr B has sole parental responsibility in relation to commencing and managing personal injury claims on behalf of X born in 2008 and Y born in 2013 ("the children"), as a result of the motor vehicle accident which occurred on 24 March 2019, including the following decisions:
(a)Authority to engage Lawyers on behalf of the children to act in all aspects of the matter and provide continuing instructions on behalf of the children in the place of the parents;
(b)Authority to sign all documents and directions and authorities including authorities to medical practitioners that would otherwise be signed jointly by the parents;
(c)Authority to act as the litigation guardian on behalf of the children in any proceedings commenced in a State Court;
(d)Authority to undertake necessary pre-action procedures on behalf of the children, prior to filing the claims;
(e)Authority to make decisions on behalf of the children in relation to the personal injury claims, such as making proposals or accepting settlement offers;
3.That in relation to his exercise of sole parental responsibility, Mr B will:
(a)Advise the parents of any decision to be made in exercise of his sole parental responsibility in advance of the decision being made;
(b)Consider the parents' views in relation to the decision to be made;
(c)Advise the parents of…
Continue reading Agambar & Agambar
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Agambar & Agambar [2021] FCCA 1113
- Case
- [2021] FCCA 1113
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether to join a Mr B to the proceedings and, if so, to make orders regarding parental responsibility for decisions relating to the children's personal injury claims. Specifically, the court had to consider the extent of Mr B's authority in managing these claims, including engaging legal representation, signing documents, acting as a litigation guardian, undertaking pre-action procedures, and making decisions on settlement offers.
Vasta J applied section 64C of the *Family Law Act 1975* to grant Mr B sole parental responsibility for commencing and managing the personal injury claims on behalf of the children. This authority encompassed a broad range of decisions, including the engagement of lawyers, signing of documents, acting as litigation guardian in state court proceedings, undertaking pre-action steps, and making decisions regarding settlement. However, the court also stipulated that Mr B must advise the parents of any proposed decision in advance, consider their views, and inform them of the final decision within seven days of making it.
The court ordered that Mr B be joined to the proceedings and granted him sole parental responsibility for the children's personal injury claims, subject to the conditions outlined regarding consultation with the parents.
Orders
Orders of the court
BRC 8532 of 2019
BETWEEN:
MS AGAMBAR
Applicant
AND:
MR AGAMBAR
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE VASTA
DATE OF ORDER:
4 MAY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. That Mr B be joined to these proceedings.
2. That pursuant to section 64C of the Family Law Act 1975, Mr B has sole parental responsibility in relation to commencing and managing personal injury claims on behalf of X born in 2008 and Y born in 2013 ("the children"), as a result of the motor vehicle accident which occurred on 24 March 2019, including the following decisions:
(a) Authority to engage Lawyers on behalf of the children to act in all aspects of the matter and provide continuing instructions on behalf of the children in the place of the parents;
(b) Authority to sign all documents and directions and authorities including authorities to medical practitioners that would otherwise be signed jointly by the parents;
(c) Authority to act as the litigation guardian on behalf of the children in any proceedings commenced in a State Court;
(d) Authority to undertake necessary pre-action procedures on behalf of the children, prior to filing the claims;
(e) Authority to make decisions on behalf of the children in relation to the personal injury claims, such as making proposals or accepting settlement offers;
3. That in relation to his exercise of sole parental responsibility, Mr B will:
(a) Advise the parents of any decision to be made in exercise of his sole parental responsibility in advance of the decision being made;
(b) Consider the parents' views in relation to the decision to be made;
(c) Advise the parents of the decision ultimately made as soon as practicable and within seven (7) days of making the decision.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.