[2014] FWCA 2247 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Advocare Inc.
(AG2014/5129)
ADVOCARE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 9 APRIL 2014 |
Application for approval of the Advocare Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] On 27 March 2014, Advocare Inc made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Advocare Enterprise Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 24 March 2014.
[3] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.
[4] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[5] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) has declared that the ASU was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and is entitled to represent the industrial interests of those employees in accordance with paragraph 176(1)(b) of the FW Act. Further, the ASU supports the approval of the Agreement by the Commission. Finally, the ASU has given notice that, pursuant to s.183 of the FW Act, it wants to be covered by the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 16 April 2014. The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE407561 PR549320>
- AGLC
- Advocare Inc. [2014] FWCA 2247
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2247
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. This included assessing whether the agreement was made in good faith, without coercion, and whether it provided for the proper operation of the enterprise. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement provided for the resolution of disputes and if it was appropriate for the employees it covered.
The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion, and that it contained provisions for the proper operation of the enterprise. The agreement also included provisions for the resolution of disputes. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was appropriate for the employees it covered and met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the Advocare Enterprise Agreement 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.