ADR Security Solutions

Case

[2019] FWCA 2421

10 APRIL 2019

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2019] FWCA 2421
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

ADR Security Solutions
(AG2019/899)

ADR SECURITY SOLUTIONS PTY. LTD. AND ETU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2010-2014

Electrical contracting industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 10 APRIL 2019

Application for termination of the ADR Security Solutions Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014.

[1] ADR Security Solutions (Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to terminate the ADR Security Solutions Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014 (Agreement). The Agreement covers the Applicant, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), and the employees identified in Clause 1 of the Agreement. The Agreement passed its nominal expiry date on 31 October 2014.

[2] Section 225 of the Act provides:

    “225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

    If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

    (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

    (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

    (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”

[3] Section 226 of the Act provides:

    “226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

    (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

    (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

      (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

      (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[4] In correspondence to my Chambers on 9 April 2019, the CEPU advised that it did not oppose the application. There are employees employed by the Applicant who are covered by the Agreement.

[5] The employees covered by the Agreement have each signed a document endorsing the termination of the Agreement. Furthermore, the Applicant has undertaken to the relevant employees that it will continue to meet the relevant entitlements under the Agreement in respect of each employee by maintaining these provisions in the contracts of employment of the employees. In all other respects the Modern Award will apply.

[6] Based on the material contained in the employer’s declaration filed with the application, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. There are no other circumstances apparent to me which would militate against this conclusion. As the matters in s.226(a) and (b) are satisfied, the Agreement must be terminated and I terminate the Agreement.

[7] The termination will operate from 10 April 2019.

[8] An order giving effect to this decision is separately issued in PR706761.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE885683  PR706759>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0