| [2017] FWCA 479 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Adfinis Pty Ltd
(AG2016/7092)
ADFINIS PTY LTD ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT FOR NEW SOUTH WALES 2015-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Adfinis Pty Ltd On-site Construction Enterprise Agreement for New South Wales 2015-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Adfinis Pty Ltd On-site Construction Enterprise Agreement for New South Wales 2015-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Adfinis Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[7] The Agreement was approved on 24 January 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 31 January 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE423119 PR589630>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Adfinis Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 479
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 479
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement contained all the required terms under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it complied with the "better off overall test." The applicants argued that the agreement was comprehensive and beneficial for employees, while the respondents claimed that certain clauses disadvantaged workers and failed to meet the required standards. The Commission had to assess the provisions of the agreement, including wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms, to ensure they were fair and met legislative requirements.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission considered the provisions of the agreement and the evidence presented by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement generally met the legislative requirements and was fair and reasonable. However, it made several modifications to specific clauses to address the respondents' concerns and ensure compliance with the better off overall test. The Commission concluded that, with these adjustments, the agreement would provide a fair and equitable outcome for both the employer and the employees.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Adfinis Pty Ltd On-site Construction Enterprise Agreement for New South Wales 2015-2018, subject to the modifications made to specific clauses. The changes were aimed at ensuring the agreement met the legal standards and provided a fair and reasonable outcome for all parties involved. The Commission's decision recognised the need for a balanced approach in industrial relations, taking into account the interests of both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.