Adapt-A-Lift Rentals & Sales Pty Ltd T/A Adaptalift Hyster

Case [2014] FWC 5112


[2014] FWC 5112
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Adapt-A-Lift Rentals & Sales Pty Ltd T/A Adaptalift Hyster
(AG2014/6808)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC

MELBOURNE, 29 JULY 2014

Application for approval of the Adapt-A-Lift Hyster Collective Agreement (Victoria & Tasmania) 2014 - approval refused.

[1] An application has been made by Adapt-A-Lift Forklift Rentals and Sales Pty Ltd T/A Adaptalift Hyster (Applicant) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Adapt-A-Lift Hyster Collective Agreement (Victoria & Tasmania) 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] Section 181 of the Act states:

    “181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed enterprise agreement

    (1) An employer that will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement may request the employees employed at the time who will be covered by the agreement to approve the agreement by voting for it.

    (2) The request must not be made untilat least 21 days after the day on which the last notice under subsection 173(1) (which deals with giving notice of employee representational rights) in relation to the agreement is given.

    (3) Without limiting subsection (1), the employer may request that the employees vote by ballot or by an electronic method.” [underlining added]

[3] Based on the information contained in the Form F17 – Employer’s statutory declaration in support of an application for approval of an enterprise agreement, voting on the agreement by employees occurred on 4 July 2014 which is the twenty first day after 13 June 2014 (the date the last Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) was given to employees). In other words, voting on the agreement commenced before “at least 21 days after” the last NERR was given to employees as required bys.181(2) of the Act.

[4] As such, the agreement was not properly “made” in accordance with s.182 of the Act, nor was it genuinely agreed to as defined in s.188 of the Act. The application for approval of the Agreement is therefore dismissed.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR553662>

Details
AGLC
Adapt-A-Lift Rentals & Sales Pty Ltd T/A Adaptalift Hyster [2014] FWC 5112
Case
[2014] FWC 5112
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were Adapt-A-Lift Rentals & Sales Pty Ltd, trading as Adaptalift Hyster, and the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred around the approval of the Adapt-A-Lift Hyster Collective Agreement (Victoria & Tasmania) 2014. The court hearing this matter was the Fair Work Commission, which was tasked with determining whether the agreement should be approved or not. The company sought the approval of this agreement to formalise the terms and conditions of employment for its employees in Victoria and Tasmania.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the collective agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing if the agreement contained all the mandated terms, was free from prohibited content, and complied with procedural requirements. Additionally, the court had to consider if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it sought to cover.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did not include all the mandated terms required by the Fair Work Act. Specifically, it lacked certain provisions regarding parental leave and redundancy payments. The court also noted procedural deficiencies in how the agreement was negotiated and presented. As a result, the Commission refused to approve the agreement. The decision emphasised the importance of compliance with legislative requirements and proper procedural adherence in the negotiation and presentation of collective agreements. The court’s decision ensured that the rights and protections afforded to employees under the Act were upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.