AD/A330/86 Amdt 2 MLG Bogie Beam (Cth)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

On the effective date specified below, and for the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/A330/86 Amdt 1 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.001(1) of CASR 1998.  The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.

Airbus Industrie A330 Series Aeroplanes

AD/A330/86 Amdt 2 MLG Bogie Beam 8/2008

Applicability:

All Model A330-200 and A330-300 series aircraft, all serial numbers; except aircraft on which Airbus modification 54500 has been incorporated in production or aircraft with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-32-3212 incorporated in service.

Requirement:

Action in accordance with the requirements of EASA AD 2008-0093.

Note:  Airbus Service Bulletin A330-32-3225 original issue, and Messier-Dowty VSB No. A33/34-32-271 original issue, or later EASA approved revisions, refer.

Compliance:

As specified in the Requirement document, with a revised effective date of
31 July 2008.

This Amendment becomes effective on 31 July 2008.

Background:

An operator report was received of a fracture of the right hand main landing gear bogie beam on an A330 aircraft whilst turning during low speed ground taxi manoeuvres.  The bogie fractured aft of the pivot point and remained attached to the sliding tube by the brake reaction rods.  Investigation revealed the failure initiated from corrosion pitting on the bore of the bogie beam.  The internal paint had degraded which lead to a loss of cadmium plating.  If not corrected, this situation under higher speed could result in the aircraft departing the runway, the bogie detaching from the aircraft, or a gear collapse.

Amendment 1 clarified the inspection compliance time and extended the reporting period.

Amendment 2 is issued in response to a new EASA AD, which reduces the inspection threshold from 6 to 4.5 years due to significant findings on the aircraft inspected.


David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority

12 June 2008

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0