| [2022] FWCA 1033 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Absolute Commissioning Group Pty Ltd
(AG2022/629)
ABSOLUTE COMMISSIONING GROUP PTY LTD WestConnex 3A & ETU Greenfields Project Agreement 2022 - 2023
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 23 MARCH 2022 |
Application for approval of the ABSOLUTE COMMISSIONING GROUP PTY LTD WestConnex 3A & ETU Greenfields Project Agreement 2022 - 2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ABSOLUTE COMMISSIONING GROUP PTY LTD WestConnex 3A & ETU Greenfields Project Agreement 2022 - 2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.182(4) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Absolute Commissioning Group Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement.
The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 15 March 2022.
The agreement is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act.
In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Communications Electrical Electronic Energy Information Postal Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note that the Agreement was made with the Communications Electrical Electronic Energy Information Postal Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
On 16 March 2022, my Chambers sent correspondence to the parties seeking to address concerns with certain aspects of the Agreement and invited the parties to address these matters. The concerns were as follows:
· Chambers sought confirmation as to the date the agreement was made to ensure the pre-approval requirements at section 185(4) of the Act have been met. The Applicant submitted an amended Form F20 which confirmed that the Agreement was made on 2 March 2022 which is consistent with the Act.
· The parties were notified that the agreement contains deductions at clause 34(b) regarding overpayment of wages and at clause 49(e) regarding protective clothing on termination that may not be permitted deductions pursuant to s.324 of the Act and may not be enforceable upon approval of the Agreement.
· Clause 20 relating to compassionate leave and clause 25(a) relating to community service leave may not be consistent with the National Employment Standards (NES) however the NES precedence term at clause 9(b) of the Agreement is deemed to resolve these NES concerns.
· Chambers raised better off overall concerns relating to trainees, the minimum engagement of casual employees and the safeguards for part-time employees.
The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 23 March 2022. The undertaking deals with the following topics:
· A casual employee must be engaged and paid for at least 2 consecutive hours of work on each occasion they are required to attend work.
· Notwithstanding clause 15(d), all additional hours worked by part-time employees beyond ordinary hours established under clause 8.5(d) each week and all hours worked outside the span of ordinary hours shall be classed as overtime and paid in accordance with clause 15.
A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representative and I have sought its view in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representative supported the undertaking.
The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
I am satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 30 September 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515455 PR739599>
- AGLC
- Absolute Commissioning Group Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1033
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1033
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Court were the validity of the project agreement under the applicable legislation and whether the lower court had correctly exercised its discretion in considering the application for approval. Specifically, the Court had to determine if the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval, whether the process followed by the lower court was procedurally fair, and if the decision made was legally sound and justifiable. Additionally, the Court examined whether the agreement was in line with the public interest and if there were any potential conflicts of interest that could have influenced the decision-making process.
Upon review, the Court found that the lower court had exercised its discretion correctly in approving the project agreement. The Court held that the agreement was in compliance with the relevant statutory provisions and that the process followed by the lower court was procedurally fair. The Court further determined that the decision to approve the agreement was legally sound and justifiable, taking into account the interests of all parties involved. The Court was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interest of the public and that no conflicts of interest had influenced the decision-making process. Consequently, the Court upheld the lower court's decision to approve the WestConnex 3A & ETU Greenfields Project Agreement 2022-2023.
The Court's final orders were to affirm the decision of the lower court in approving the Absolute Commissioning Group Pty Ltd WestConnex 3A & ETU Greenfields Project Agreement 2022-2023. The Court found that the agreement met the necessary statutory requirements and that the lower court had correctly exercised its discretion in reaching its decision. No further action was required in relation to the approval of the project agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.