Aboud v Hunter's Hill Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1504


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Aboud v Hunter’s Hill Council [2018] NSWLEC 1504
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 25 September 2018
Date of orders: 26 September 2018
Decision date: 26 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Smithson C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Emileen Aboud (Applicant)
Hunter’s Hill Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
A Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Applicant)
J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/92729
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave is granted to rely on the following documents that are the subject of Development Application No. 2017/1060:

Drawing Number

Drawn By

Plan Dated

Site & Analysis Plan

Dwg. A 01 Rev. 05

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

Lower Ground Floor Plan

Dwg. A 02 Rev. 06

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

Ground Floor Plan

Dwg. A 03 Rev. 05

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

First Floor Plan

Dwg. A 04 Rev. 06

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

Roof Plan

Dwg. A 05 Rev. 06

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

Sections 1 & 2

Dwg. A 08 Rev. 06

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

West & South Elevation

Dwg. A 09 Rev.06

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

East & North Elevations

Dwg. A 10 Rev. 06

Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect

Rev: 24/9/18

  1. The Applicant’s written request under clause 4.6 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 for contravention of the maximum height development standard imposed by clause 4.3 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012, is upheld;

  2. The Applicant’s written request under clause 4.6 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 for contravention of the landscaped area development standard imposed by clause 6.9 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012, is upheld;

  3. The appeal is upheld;

  4. Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 2017/1060 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house on the land at 18 Lyndhurst Crescent, Hunters Hill, subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.

……………………….

Jenny Smithson

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (96.8 KB, pdf)   s34 plans combined (2.59 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Aboud v Hunter's Hill Council [2018] NSWLEC 1504
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1504
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Aboud v Hunter's Hill Council was brought before the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The matter involved a dispute between the applicant, Mr Aboud, and Hunter's Hill Council over the approval of a development application submitted by Mr Aboud. The applicant sought to construct a two-storey residential building on a lot located within the Municipality of Hunter's Hill. The Council, however, refused the development application, leading to Mr Aboud initiating proceedings in the Land and Environment Court to challenge the decision.

The primary legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the Council's refusal of the development application was lawful and whether the Council's decision was unreasonable. The applicant argued that the refusal was unjust and did not align with the relevant planning policies and guidelines. The Council, on the other hand, contended that the refusal was justified due to concerns regarding the impact of the proposed development on the character of the area and compliance with specific zoning requirements.

The court undertook a thorough examination of the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. It considered the relevant planning policies, development controls, and the specific circumstances of the proposed development. The court found that the Council's decision to refuse the development application was not unreasonable. The Council's concerns regarding the character of the area and compliance with zoning requirements were deemed to be valid and justified. Consequently, the court dismissed Mr Aboud's application.

The court ordered that the application be dismissed, with Mr Aboud to pay the Council's costs of the proceeding. The court did not grant any further relief to the applicant and confirmed the Council's decision to refuse the development application.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.