ABL Nominees Pty Ltd v Trinick (Administrators) (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

ABL Nominees Pty Ltd v Trinick (Administrators) (No 2) [2018] FCA 204

File number: SAD 379 of 2015
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – whether the first respondent ought to pay the applicants’ costs of the proceeding, fixed in a lump sum amount – whether the first respondent ought to pay the trustee of the bankrupt estate any funds withdrawn from the estate of the second respondent – whether the first respondent ought to pay the applicants’ costs of the interim application
Legislation:

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 179, 222, 222C

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02

Cases cited:

ABL Nominees Pty Ltd v Trinick (Trustee) [2016] FCA 996

Beach Petroleum NL and Another v Johnson and Others (1995) 135 ALR 160

Warner v Mayfair Ltd and Others (2015) 238 FCR 531

Date of hearing: 11 August 2017
Date of last submissions: 15 September 2017
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Marsh
Solicitor for the Applicants: Fisher Jeffries
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear

ORDERS

SAD 379 of 2015
BETWEEN:

ABL NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 106 756 521)

First Applicant

BENDIGO AND ADELAIDE BANK LIMITED (ACN 068 049 178)

Second Applicant

AND:

JAMES GLENN TRINICK AND LINDA CHRISTINA TRINICK AS ADMINISTRATORS OF THE DECEASED ESTATE OF GLENN DOUGLAS TRINICK

First Respondent

DAVID MARTIN IRVIN

Second Respondent

JUDGE:

BESANKO J

DATE OF ORDER:

2 MARCH 2018

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The first respondent pay the applicants’ costs of the proceeding, fixed in a lump sum amount of $121,928.98.

2.Pursuant to the undertaking given by Mr Glenn Douglas Trinick and the orders made by the Court on 21 December 2015, the first respondent pay to Mr Stephen Michell in his capacity as trustee of the bankrupt estate of David Martin Irvin any funds withdrawn from the estate of the second respondent pursuant to the orders made on 21 December 2015 and used to pay the costs, fees or other expenses of Gretsas & Associates Lawyers.

3.The first respondent pay the applicants’ costs of the interim application dated 1 June 2017.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BESANKO J:

  1. On 22 August 2016, I made an order that pursuant to s 222 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (the Act) that a Personal Insolvency Agreement executed by Mr Glenn Trinick as controlling trustee, and Mr David Irvin as the debtor, on 9 October 2015, be set aside. I also made an order that a sequestration order be made against the estate of Mr David Martin Irvin pursuant to s 222(10) of the Act, and an order that further consideration of the applicants’ application for the appointment of a trustee and for an order for costs be adjourned to a date to be…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read ABL Nominees Pty Ltd v Trinick (Administrators) (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCA 204
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties in this case were ABL Nominees Pty Ltd and Trinick (Administrators), which were before the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute involved whether the first respondent should pay the applicants’ costs of the proceeding, the amount of any funds withdrawn from the estate of the second respondent, and the applicants’ costs of the interim application. The court was required to decide these legal issues.

The court considered whether the first respondent should pay the applicants’ costs of the proceeding, fixed in a lump sum amount. The court also had to decide whether the first respondent should pay the trustee of the bankrupt estate any funds withdrawn from the estate of the second respondent. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the first respondent should pay the applicants’ costs of the interim application. The court examined the relevant legal principles and facts to reach its decisions.

The court found that the first respondent should pay the applicants’ costs of the proceeding, fixed in a lump sum amount of $121,928.98. The court also found that the first respondent should pay to the trustee of the bankrupt estate any funds withdrawn from the estate of the second respondent pursuant to the orders made on 21 December 2015 and used to pay the costs, fees or other expenses of Gretsas & Associates Lawyers. Finally, the court found that the first respondent should pay the applicants’ costs of the interim application dated 1 June 2017.

The court made the orders as outlined above, which included the payment of costs and the repayment of funds to the trustee of the bankrupt estate. The orders were entered in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The first respondent pay the applicants’ costs of the proceeding, fixed in a lump sum amount of $121,928.98.

2. Pursuant to the undertaking given by Mr Glenn Douglas Trinick and the orders made by the Court on 21 December 2015, the first respondent pay to Mr Stephen Michell in his capacity as trustee of the bankrupt estate of David Martin Irvin any funds withdrawn from the estate of the second respondent pursuant to the orders made on 21 December 2015 and used to pay the costs, fees or other expenses of Gretsas & Associates Lawyers.

3. The first respondent pay the applicants’ costs of the interim application dated 1 June 2017.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.