Abh18 v Minister for Home Affairs

Case [2020] HCASL 219

ABH18

v

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR

[2020] HCASL 219
A14/2020

  1. An extension of time is required to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The appeal foreshadowed by the application for special leave would not turn on any question of general principle; and, in any event, the proposed appeal does not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. The application should be dismissed. That being so, it would be futile to grant the necessary extension of time.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

S.J. Gageler P.A. Keane
14 October 2020
Details
AGLC
Abh18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] HCASL 219
Case
[2020] HCASL 219
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, identified as ABH18, sought an extension of time to lodge an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The decision in question related to the applicant's visa application and subsequent cancellation order. The matter was heard in the High Court of Australia, which has the ultimate appellate jurisdiction in Australia.

The central legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant the applicant an extension of time to lodge the application for special leave. This required the Court to assess whether the proposed appeal had sufficient prospects of success and whether it involved any question of general principle that warranted special leave. Additionally, the Court had to consider whether granting the extension would be futile.

In dismissing the application, the High Court found that the proposed appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success and did not turn on any question of general principle. Consequently, the Court determined that granting the extension of time would be futile. Therefore, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and the Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order accordingly. The Court also ordered that the costs of the application be paid by the applicant.

The final orders of the High Court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.