Abdulkader (Migration)

[2023] AATA 3975

Abdulkader (Migration) [2023] AATA 3975 (10 July 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mrs Roukiya Abdulkader

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Houssam Hayba (MARN: 0001536)

CASE NUMBER:  2306177

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2018/3807711

MEMBER:Gabrielle Cullen

DATE:10 July 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 100 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)

Statement made on 10 July 2023 at 5:55pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa – Subclass 100 (Spouse) – character test – statement from an appropriate authority – Australian Federal Police Certificate – no conviction recorded – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65

Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA; Schedule 4, PIC 4001

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 18 June 2018. The criteria for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa are set out in Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Additional criteria are prescribed in Division 2.1 of Part 2 of the Regulations.

3. Regulation 2.03AA of the Regulations applies where a person is required to satisfy Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4001 or 4002: reg 2.03AA(1). In this case, of Schedule 2 of the Regulations requires the applicant to meet PIC 4001. The applicant is therefore required to satisfy the criterion in reg 2.03AA(2).

4. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a statement from a relevant authority in a country where the person resides or has resided that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(b) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a completed approved Form 80. The Tribunal may waive the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(a) if it is not reasonable for the applicant to provide the statement: reg 2.03AA(3). The Tribunal cannot waive the requirement for the applicant to provide a completed Form 80.

5. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 17 April 2023 on the basis that the applicant did not meet reg 2.03AA because he had not provided an Australian Police Clearance Certificate following numerous requests to provide one

6. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

7. The issue in this case is whether the applicant has provided a statement by an appropriate authority that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal histor

   Has the applicant provided a statement from an appropriate authority?

8. On 29 May 2023 the applicant provided an AFP Certificate dated 26 May 2023.There is no conviction recorded in the police certificate.

9. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has provided a statement from an appropriate authority and therefore meets Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a).

   Conclusion

10. There is no evidence that the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide a completed approved Form 80, therefore the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(b) does not apply.

11. On the basis of the above findings, the applicant meets reg 2.03AA(2)

    DECISION

12. The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 100 visa:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

    Gabrielle Cullen
    Member