FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ABDOO & ABDOO | [2011] FamCAFC 234 |
| FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – PROPERTY SETTLEMENT – where the husband appealed against the Federal Magistrate’s order that the proceeds of sale from one of the properties owned by the parties be divided $238,000 to the wife and the balance to the husband – where the Federal Magistrate preferred the evidence of the wife and eldest daughter over the evidence of the husband and his current wife as to the identification and value of the parties’ assets – where the Federal Magistrate found that the husband had failed to make full and frank disclosure of his assets – where the husband sought on appeal an order that the proceeds of sale be divided with the husband to receive $238,000 and the wife to receive the remaining balance – where the husband was unable to persuade the Court that the Federal Magistrate erred in his findings – appeal dismissed. FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – APPLICATION TO ADDUCE FURTHER EVIDENCE – where it was not apparent on the face of all the documents in respect of which leave was sought what relevance they had to the appeal or the issues in dispute before the Federal Magistrate – where the Court considered very few if any of the documents would be admissible as evidence and was not persuaded that the documents would render erroneous the decision of the Federal Magistrate – application dismissed. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 93A(2) |
| CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 Mims & Green and Green (2008) FLC 93-359 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) and Others (1999) 160 ALR 588 Weir and Weir (1993) FLC 92-338 |
| APPELLANT: | Mr Abdoo |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Abdoo |
| FILE NUMBER: | MLC | 4987 | of | 2007 |
| APPEAL NUMBER: | SA | 86 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 14 December 2011 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Adelaide |
| PLACE HEARD: | Melbourne |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Strickland J |
| HEARING DATE: | 28 April 2011 |
| LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: | Federal Magistrates Court |
| LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: | 13 October 2010 |
| LOWER COURT MNC: | [2010] FMCAfam 1117 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPELLANT: | In person |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
Orders
The Application in a Case filed by the husband on 28 March 2011 be dismissed.
The appeal be dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Abdoo v Abdoo is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| IN THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
Appeal Number: SA 86 of 2010
File Number: MLC 4987 of 2007
| Mr Abdoo |
Appellant
And
| Ms Abdoo |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an appeal by Mr Abdoo (“the husband’) against property settlement orders made by Federal Magistrate Roberts on 13 October 2010 in proceedings between the husband and Ms Abdoo (“the wife”).
In summary, the Federal Magistrate ordered that the wife receive the sum of $238,000 from the proceeds of sale of the parties’ property in Melbourne suburb and…
Continue reading Abdoo and Abdoo
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Abdoo and Abdoo [2011] FamCAFC 234
- Case
- [2011] FamCAFC 234
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Application in a Case filed by the husband on 28 March 2011 be dismissed.
2.
The appeal be dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.