| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
Citation: | AAI Limited t/as GIO v Kalantzis [2023] NSWPIC 252 |
| Claimant: | John Kalantzis |
| insurer: | AAI Limited t/as GIO |
| Member: | Shana Radnan |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 26 May 2023 |
CATCHWORDS: | MOTOR ACCIDENTS - Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017; settlement approval; $195,000; 48-year-old male; past and future economic loss only; 1% whole person impairment; left shoulder surgery, hip pain and aggravation of pre-existing low back degenerative condition; section 6.23; Held – the proposed settlement is just, fair and reasonable; settlement approved. |
| determinations made: | Settlement Approval 1. This proposed settlement is approved. 2. The proposed settlement is approved under s 6.23(2)(b) of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. 3. The proposed settlement complies with cl 7.392 to cl 7.411 of the Motor Accident Injuries Guidelines. |
STATEMENT OF REASONS
INTRODUCTION
On 23 September 2020 John Kalantzis (the claimant) sustained injury in a motor vehicle accident (the accident).
The claimant has made a claim against GIO (the insurer) of the at fault vehicle, for lump sum damages.
The insurer accepted liability for the claimant’s claim for statutory benefits and has paid him $90,910.72 by way of statutory weekly benefits and seeks credit for that sum.
The claimant was rear ended and pushed into the vehicle in front of him, resulting in a six car chain collision. The claimant’s airbags did not deploy as a result of the accident. Neither police or ambulance attended the accident scene.
An Application for Common Law Damages was lodged on 12 September 2022 and liability was admitted in full on 7 December 2022 (document A3).
INJURIES
As a result of the accident, the claimant contends he sustained the following injuries:
(a) left shoulder (requiring surgery);
(b) cervical spine – soft tissue injury;
(c) lumbar spine – soft tissue injury, and
(d) bilateral hips – soft tissue injury.
Following the accident, the claimant consulted his general practitioner (GP), Dr Gurigis, who arranged for him to undergo an ultrasound of his left shoulder. This ultrasound revealed a tear and the claimant was referred to Dr Doron Sher, orthopaedic surgeon, who recommend the claimant undergo surgery.
The claimant sought a second opinion from Dr Moopanar, orthopaedic surgeon, who also recommended the claimant undergo surgery.
On 29 January 2021 the claimant underwent surgery in the form of a left shoulder arthroscopy, rotator cuff repair and bicep tenodesis (document A6).
Up until undergoing shoulder surgery the claimant had been working in his usual capacity, being certified fit to do so. Following his surgery, the claimant had approximately five months off work to allow for recovery, returning to work in June 2021, on a restricted basis. As at 12 July 2021, the claimant was certified as fit for pre-injury duties (document A14).
The claimant has been assessed by Dr Rogers, occupational physician, on behalf of GIO. In report dated 9 February 2023 (document A5) Dr Rogers confirmed the circumstances of the accident and noted the claimant to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read AAI Limited t/as GIO v Kalantzis and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] NSWPIC 252
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to resolve were whether the settlement amount was just and reasonable, taking into account the nature and extent of the injuries, the age and circumstances of the plaintiff, and the provisions of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017. Specifically, the court needed to ensure that the settlement adequately reflected the plaintiff's economic losses and did not fail to consider non-economic losses. The court examined the evidence presented regarding the plaintiff's medical conditions, the impact of those conditions on his life, and the terms of the proposed settlement.
After careful consideration of the evidence and the statutory requirements, the court determined that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. The court acknowledged the plaintiff's economic losses, the impact of the injuries on his ability to work and enjoy life, and the adequacy of the settlement amount to cover those losses. The court concluded that the settlement appropriately balanced the plaintiff's needs against the interests of the insurer. Therefore, the court approved the settlement.
The court's decision was that the settlement was just, fair, and reasonable. The court ordered that the settlement of $195,000 be approved and that the plaintiff receive the agreed amount to cover his past and future economic loss. This decision provided the plaintiff with the financial support needed to manage his injuries and the insurer with finality in the matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.