| [2020] FWCA 2243 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
A & G Pipelines Pty Ltd
(AG2020/669)
A & G PIPELINES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 29 APRIL 2020 |
A & G Pipelines Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the A & G Pipelines Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by A & G Pipelines Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 6 May 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 May 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507926 PR718684>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- A & G Pipelines Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 2243
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 2243
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission was required to decide included whether certain provisions of the enterprise agreement were lawful, whether they complied with relevant federal industrial legislation, and whether they were consistent with the principles of good faith bargaining. The employees argued that the agreement contained clauses that were overly restrictive and not in line with the statutory framework governing enterprise agreements. The company, on the other hand, maintained that the agreement was a fair and reasonable outcome of the bargaining process and was in compliance with all relevant legal standards.
In its decision, the Commission carefully examined the language of the enterprise agreement and the context in which it was negotiated and agreed upon. The Commission found that several clauses were indeed problematic and did not meet the legal standards required for enforceability. Specifically, the Commission identified issues with clauses pertaining to employee entitlements, working hours, and dispute resolution mechanisms. As a result, the Commission made orders to amend certain provisions of the agreement to ensure compliance with the law and to protect the rights of the employees. The company was required to renegotiate certain aspects of the agreement with the employees' representatives to address the identified issues.
In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission's decision underscores the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are negotiated in good faith and comply with all applicable legal standards. The Commission's ruling serves as a reminder to both employers and employees of the need for clear, lawful, and equitable agreements that protect the rights of all parties involved. The case highlights the role of the Commission in reviewing and, where necessary, invalidating clauses within enterprise agreements that do not meet the required legal standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.