A-G of the Commonwealth of Australia v Alinta Limited
[2007] HCATrans 794
[2007] HCATrans 794
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S331 of 2007
B e t w e e n -
ATTORNEY‑GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant
and
ALINTA LIMITED
First Respondent
TREWAS PTY LIMITED
Second Respondent
TAKEOVERS PANEL
Third Respondent
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Fourth Respondent
AUSTRALIAN PIPELINE LIMITED (IN ITS CAPACITY AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OF AUSTRALIAN PIPELINE TRUST)
Fifth Respondent
Pronouncement of orders
GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW J
KIRBY J
HAYNE J
HEYDON J
CRENNAN J
KIEFEL J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 13 DECEMBER 2007, AT 10.03 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
__________________
GLEESON CJ: This appeal was heard in Canberra on 2 and 3 October 2007 by a Court constituted by Justices Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and myself. The Court would allow the appeal and make consequential orders. We are in a position to make those orders now. Reasons for the decision will be published at a future date.
The orders of the Court are:
1.Appeal allowed.
2.Set aside so much of paragraph 2 of the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 30 April 2007 as ordered that there be a declaration that s 657A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is invalid and, in its place, order that there be a declaration that s 657A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is not invalid on the ground that it purports to confer the judicial power of the Commonwealth on the Takeovers Panel.
I publish those orders.
AT 10.04 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Constitutional Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
0