| [2018] FWCA 3902 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre Pty Ltd T/A A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre
(AG2018/2692)
A.B. PATERSON COLLEGE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTRE EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2016
Children's services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 4 JULY 2018 |
Application for variation of the A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre Employee Collective Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made to vary the A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre Employee Collective Agreement 2016 (the Agreement) to remove ambiguity or uncertainty. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement and the application has been made by A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre Pty Ltd T/A A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre (the Applicant) to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009(the Act).
[2] The United Voice is covered by the Agreement and has supported this application.
[3] The variation proposed is to replace the classification of Group Leader (3 Year (Qualified) of Step Year 3 at Schedule A with the following:-
Classification | Step | (A) Current Hourly Rate at 1 July 2016 | (B) Hourly Rate at 1 July 2017 | (C) Hourly Rate at 1 July 2018 |
Year 3 | $27.73 | $ 28.56 | $29.42 |
[4] I am satisfied that the variation proposed will correct the relevant ambiguity or uncertainty in a manner that reflects the mutual intention of the parties.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and will operate on and from 4 July 2018.
[6] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is attached.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427541 PR608632>
- AGLC
- A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre Pty Ltd T/A A.B. Paterson College Early Childhood Centre [2018] FWCA 3902
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3902
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed changes to the collective agreement were reasonable and necessary, and whether they complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The employer argued that the changes were not warranted and would impose an undue financial burden on the business. The employees, on the other hand, contended that the proposed changes were essential to address ongoing issues and to ensure fair and equitable working conditions.
The Fair Work Commission assessed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It considered the economic viability of the employer, the reasonableness of the proposed changes, and the impact on the employees. The Commission found that while some of the proposed changes were reasonable and necessary, others were not justified. It concluded that a modified version of the proposed changes was appropriate and ordered the variation of the collective agreement accordingly.
The final orders of the Commission included specific amendments to the pay rates, working conditions, and other terms of employment as modified. The Commission also directed the parties to implement the agreed changes within a specified timeframe and to return to the Commission if any further disputes arose. The decision provides guidance on the process for varying collective agreements and the considerations that must be taken into account by both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.