| [2019] FWCA 1358 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
A & A Mango Contracting Pty Ltd
(AG2018/2675)
A & A MANGO CONTRACTING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Agricultural industry | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 8 MARCH 2019 |
Application for approval of the A & A Mango Contracting Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] Further to my Decision in Ceres Farm Enterprise Agreement 2018 & Ors 1, thisdecision deals with the application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the A & A Mango Contracting Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by A & A Mango Contracting Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Written undertakings have been given in accordance with s.190 of the Act. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] For the reasons set out in my earlier Decision and subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 March 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 March 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502074 PR705441>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- A & A Mango Contracting Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 1358
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 1358
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed Enterprise Agreement met the criteria for approval under section 232 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The union contended that several provisions of the agreement were unfair and unreasonable, particularly in relation to wage rates, penalty rates, and annual leave entitlements. The company defended the terms, arguing that they were necessary to maintain the competitiveness of the business in a difficult economic environment.
In delivering its decision, the Commission considered the overall fairness of the proposed agreement, taking into account the nature of the enterprise and the bargaining positions of the parties. The Commission found that while some provisions were contentious, the overall balance of the agreement was fair and reasonable. The union's arguments regarding certain terms were not sufficient to render the agreement unfair. The Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, subject to minor modifications to address specific concerns raised during the hearing. These changes were deemed necessary to ensure that the agreement met the statutory requirements for fairness and reasonableness.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.