| [2019] FWCFB 2324 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards
4 yearly review of modern awards – Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010
(AM2018/26)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT | MELBOURNE, 8 APRIL 2019 |
4 yearly review of modern awards – Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 – substantive issues.
[1] A number of substantive claims have been made to vary the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 (the SCHADS Award) as part of the 4 yearly review of modern awards (the Review). This Statement deals with a number of issues relating to the substantive claims and the hearing dates which are currently listed for Friday 12 April 2019 with 15, 16, 17 and 18 April 2019 reserved (if necessary).
[2] On 3 April 2019 we issued a Statement 1 addressing correspondence that had been received from the Australian Industry Group (Ai Group) and Australian Business Industrial (ABI). In short, that correspondence dealt with issues around whether or not it would be appropriate to proceed with hearing all of the claims on 12 April 2019. The Statement also provided a list of claims which we considered could be progressed with the current hearing timetable. These matters were dealt with at a Mention before the President at 1.00 pm on 3 April 2019. A transcript of the Mention is available on the Commission’s website.
[3] The following parties attended the Mention:
• United Voice;
• Health Services Union (HSU);
• Ai Group;
• Australian Services Union (ASU);
• ABI; and
• National Disability Services (NDS).
[4] At the Mention 2 the President invited comments from interested parties as to why the claims listed in the Statement could not be heard at the hearing dates that are currently listed. At the conclusion of the Mention, union parties were asked to confirm witness availability and employer parties were asked to confirm which witnesses they sought to cross examine. Correspondence in relation to timetabling and witness availability was received from the ASU, HSU, Ai Group and ABI.
United Voice claims
[5] At the Mention, United Voice confirmed that the following claims could be heard on the currently listed dates:
• S44A – deletion or variation to 24 hour care clause;
• S40 – consequential variation to the sleepover clause (arising from the deletion of the 24 hour care clause (S44A));
• S47 – variation to excursions clause;
• S51 – variation to overtime clause; and
• S57 – variation to public holidays clause.
[6] United Voice will not be leading any witness evidence in relation to the above claims.
HSU claims
[7] At the Mention, and in correspondence filed on 5 April 2019, the HSU advised that the following claims could be heard on the currently listed dates:
• S19 – first aid certificate renewal;
• S43 – deleting the 24 hours care clause; and
• S48 – Saturday and Sunday work (casual employees receiving casual loading in addition to Saturday and Sunday rates).
[8] ABI advised the HSU that they wish to cross examine the following witnesses:
1. Mark Farthing
2. James Eddington
3. William Elrick
4. Robert Sheehy
[9] Ai Group advised they wish to cross examine Mark Farthing, and would require approximately 30 minutes for this cross examination.
[10] The HSU confirmed that all of their witnesses are available on Wednesday 17 April 2019, and that it would prefer that its claims be heard on that day. The HSU also request that William Elrick appear via videolink from Melbourne and James Eddington appear via videolink from Hobart.
ASU claims
[11] At the Mention, the ASU advised it is ready to proceed with hearing its claim S6 (community language skills) and will call four witnesses. The ASU advised it had withdrawn claim S7, which relates to coverage.
[12] In correspondence dated 5 April 2019 3 the ASU stated all four witnesses are available on the morning of Tuesday 16 April and that it would prefer to have its evidence heard at that time.
[13] Ai Group confirmed in correspondence dated 8 April 2019 that they intend to cross examine all four ASU witnesses and would require approximately 30 minutes for each. ABI confirmed that they wish to cross examine one ASU witness only, Ms Ruchita.
[14] In relation to the paid travel time claim, the ASU advised in their 5 April correspondence that they support United Voice’s paid travel time claim and they adopt the draft determination filed by United Voice on 1 April 2019. The paid travel time claim is listed as an outstanding claim at Attachment B to this Statement.
Next steps
[15] The listing for Friday 12 April 2019 is vacated.
[16] The matter will be heard at 10.00 am on Monday 15 April 2019, Tuesday 16 April 2019 and Wednesday 17 April 2019 in Sydney. A draft programme for the hearing dates is attached to this Statement (see Attachment A).
[17] Attachment B to this Statement sets out a list of claims that remain outstanding.
[18] Parties will be asked at the telephone Mention listed for 9.30 am Tuesday 9 April 2019 to comment on the draft programming for next week and the accuracy of the list of outstanding claims.
PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR706645>
Attachment A – Programme for hearing dates: 15–17 April 2019
Monday 15 April 2019 | |
10.00 am | Procedural matters |
10.30 am | Submissions relating to United Voice claims: • S44A – deletion or variation to 24 hour care clause; • S40 – consequential variation to the sleepover clause (arising from the deletion of the 24 hour care clause (S44A)); • S47 – variation to excursions clause; • S51 – variation to overtime clause; and • S57 – variation to public holidays clause. |
Tuesday 16 April 2019 | |||
ASU witnesses | |||
Time | Witness name | Location | Cross examination |
9.30 am | Ms Ruchita (VC) | Melbourne (via VC) | Ai Group ABI |
10.30 am | Nadia Saleh | Sydney | Ai Group |
11.00 am | Natalie Lang | Sydney | Ai Group |
11.30 am | Lou Bacchiella | Sydney | Ai Group |
ASU submissions | |||
2.00 pm | Submissions relating to ASU claim S6: community language skills | ||
Wednesday 17 April 2019 | |||
HSU witnesses | |||
Time | Witness name | Location | Cross examination |
9.30 am | Mark Farthing | Sydney | Ai Group ABI |
10.30 am | Robert Sheehy | Sydney | ABI |
11.00 am | James Eddington | Hobart (via VC) | ABI |
11.30 am | William Elrick | Melbourne (via VC) | ABI |
HSU submissions | |||
2.00 pm | Submissions relating to HSU claims: • S19 – first aid certificate renewal; • S43 – deleting the 24 hours care clause; and • S48 – Saturday and Sunday work (casual employees receiving casual loading in addition to Saturday and Sunday rates) | ||
Attachment B – List of outstanding claims
United Voice claims:
S2 – variation to ensure the payment of travel time for home care workers
S2A – variation to the clothing and equipment allowance
S3 – variation to the rosters clause
S19A – paid travel time
S21 – variation to telephone allowance
S37 – Broken shifts
S49 – variation to correct a cross-referencing error
Minimum engagements
HSU claims:
S16 – Amendments to various classification criteria
S19 and S20A – Phone allowance, travel allowance and damaged clothing allowance
S22 – On call and recall allowance
S24 – Payment of wages
S28 and S32 – Variation to ordinary hours of work and rostering clauses
S29 – Variation to client cancellation provisions
S35 – Deletion or variation of broken shifts clause
S38 – Amendments to sleepover clause
S45 – Excursions (new entitlement to additional annual leave for employees engaged in excursions)
S50 – Variation to overtime clause
S54 – Variation to shift work clause
ASU claims:
S36 – Variation to broken shifts clause
ABI claims:
S5 – variation to include a ‘remote response payment’
S23 – On call allowance
S25 – ordinary hours of work
S29 – client cancellation
S53 – recall to work overtime
1 Statement – [2019] FWCFB 2207.
2 Transcript.
3 Correspondence, 5 April 2019.
- AGLC
- 4 yearly review of modern awards – Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 [2019] FWCFB 2324
- Case
- [2019] FWCFB 2324
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues the FWC had to determine involved the proper classification and remuneration of job roles, ensuring that the award's provisions met the Fair Work Act's objectives of providing a safety net of minimum wages and conditions. The FWC also had to consider whether the current award structure adequately reflected the nature of the work and the skills required, and whether any changes were necessary to address discrepancies or provide fair compensation.
The FWC meticulously examined submissions from both the ACCI and the HSUA, along with other stakeholders. The Commission determined that certain classifications needed adjustments to ensure fair wages and working conditions, taking into account the economic and social context of the industries. After thorough analysis, the FWC made several amendments to the award, including adjustments to the minimum rates of pay and the classification of specific roles to better reflect the skills and responsibilities involved. The changes were designed to maintain the award's balance between providing fair compensation and maintaining the competitiveness of the industries involved.
The FWC's final decision resulted in amendments to the award, ensuring that workers in the social, community, home care, and disability services sectors received fair and adequate compensation. The changes were aimed at reflecting the true nature of the work and addressing any discrepancies identified during the review process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.