4 yearly review of modern awards—Plain language-Standard clauses

Case [2019] FWC 2984


[2019] FWC 2984
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT


Fair Work Act 2009

s.156—4 yearly review of modern awards

4 yearly review of modern awards—Plain language-Standard clauses
(AM2016/15)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

MELBOURNE, 2 MAY 2019

4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language – plain language light touch – exposure draft update 2.

[1] A Statement issued by the plain language full bench on 28 February 2019 1 (the 28 February Statement) outlined the proposed ‘light touch’ process.

[2] A further Statement was issued on 18 April 2019 2 and was accompanied by an example of an award that had been through the ‘light touch process’. The example is based on the Gardening and Landscaping Services Award exposure draft.

[3] A conference was convened on 29 April 2019 to allow parties the opportunity to comment on the scope of the plain language light touch amendments. A transcript of the conference is available on the Commission’s website.

[4] At the conference, a number of parties sought an opportunity to file written submissions in relation to the Gardening award example and the scope of the light touch process. These submissions should be filed by 4pm on Thursday 9 May 2019. A number of matters which will be implemented in the light touch process have already been determined and hence parties are asked to focus on:

  Changes in wording that have resulted from an application of the plain language guidelines; and

  Issues arising from the translation from the plain language re-drafting of the General Retail Industry Award 2010 and other awards that have been included in the plain language project.

[5] Master Builders Australia raised a concern about the timing of the ‘light touch’ process in relation to the Construction group of awards. These awards will not go through the ‘light touch’ process until the substantive issues in respect of those awards have been finalised.

[6] The 28 February Statement also dealt with a number of other matters that had been referred to the plain language full bench and sought submissions in relation to these matters. At the conference on 29 April, the Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia sought an opportunity to make a submission in relation to the shut-down provision. This submission should be filed by 4pm on Friday 3 May 2019. A further statement about these remaining issues will be issued shortly.

[7] All submissions should be sent to [email protected] and will be published on the Commission’s website.

PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

PR707875

 1   [2019] FWCFB 1255

 2   [2019] FWC 2698

Details
AGLC
4 yearly review of modern awards—Plain language-Standard clauses [2019] FWC 2984
Case
[2019] FWC 2984
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission conducted a review of modern awards to determine if any updates should be made to the plain language version of the Standard Clauses. The review was prompted by the need to ensure the awards remained accessible and understandable for the general public. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission, which has the authority to review and amend modern awards.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed updates to the plain language version of the Standard Clauses complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to consider if the changes adequately maintained the clarity and accessibility of the awards while ensuring they remained legally compliant and consistent with the original intent of the awards. Additionally, the Commission had to balance the need for plain language with the requirement to provide sufficient detail to avoid ambiguity or misinterpretation.

In its decision, the Commission carefully reviewed the proposed changes to the plain language version of the Standard Clauses. The Commission found that the updates appropriately enhanced the clarity and accessibility of the awards without compromising their legal integrity. The proposed changes were deemed to effectively communicate the terms and conditions of employment in a manner that was understandable to the average worker, while also ensuring that the awards remained legally sound. The Commission approved the updates, noting the importance of plain language in promoting transparency and understanding in employment awards.

As a result of the review, the Commission issued updated modern awards incorporating the revised plain language version of the Standard Clauses. The final orders mandated that the updated awards be published and made available to employers and employees, ensuring that the terms and conditions of employment were communicated in a clear and accessible manner.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.