| [2020] FWC 1205 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156–4 yearly review of modern awards
4 yearly review of modern awards–Payment of wages
(AM2016/8)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT | MELBOURNE, 5 MARCH 2020 |
4 yearly review of modern awards – common issue – payment of wages – payments on termination – mention listed.
[1] This statement deals with the payment of wages on termination model term.
[2] Applications have been made by Australian Industry Group (Ai Group), Australian Business Industrial (ABI) and NatRoad to insert the model term in the following 17 modern awards:
• Aged Care Award 2010
• Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2010
• Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010
• Business Equipment Award 2010
• Dry Cleaning and Laundry Industry Award 2010
• Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2010
• Food, Beverage and Tobacco Manufacturing Award 2010
• Graphic Arts, Printing and Publishing Award 2010
• Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2010
• Meat Industry Award 2010
• Mobile Crane Hiring Award 2010
• Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010
• Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2010
• Road Transport and Distribution Award 2010
• Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010
• Seafood Processing Award 2010
• Supported Employment Services Award 2010
[3] In a decision issued on 26 July 2019 1, the Payment of Wages Full Bench noted that parties had not yet had the opportunity to make submissions and adduce evidence in relation to these applications and accordingly, the applicants were invited to file submissions and any evidence in support of the applications by 4pm on 21 August 2019. In accordance with these directions submissions were received from:
• ABI 2
• Ai Group 3
• HIA 4
• NatRoad 5
[4] In a further decision on 23 August 2019, 6 (August 2019 decision) interested parties were invited to file submissions and evidence in reply by 4pm on 25 September 2019. The following submissions were received:
• AMWU 7
• CEPU 8
• CFMMEU–Construction 9
• CFMMEU–Manufacturing 10
• CFMMEU–Mining 11
• Master Builders Australia 12
• Master Plumbers Australia 13
[5] It appears that no reply submissions have been filed in respect of the applications to vary the following awards:
• Aged Care Award 2010
• Meat Industry Award 2010
• Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010
• Road Transport and Distribution Award 2010
• Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2010
• Seafood Processing Award 2010
• Supported Employment Services Award 2010
[6] In the August 2019 decision, the Full Bench said that a mention would be listed in due course.
[7] A mention will be listed before me at 1.00 pm on Thursday 12 March 2020 in Sydney. The purpose of the mention will be:
1. To confirm that the list of submissions set out at [3] and [4] above is accurate;
2. To determine whether any party wishes to make any further submissions or adduce any further evidence;
3. To determine whether an oral hearing is required in respect of any of the matters that are the subject of an application to vary.
PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR717266>
2 ABI submission, 21 August 2019
3 Ai Group submission, 21 August 2019
4 HIA submission, 21 August 2019
5 NatRoad submission and witness statement, 21 August 2019
7 AMWU submission, 25 September 2019
8 CEPU submission, 25 September 2019
9 CFMMEU –Construction submission, 25 September 2019
10 CFMMEU–Manufacturing submission, 30 September 2019
11 CFMMEU–Mining submission, 25 September 2019
12 MBA submission, 25 September 2019
13 MPA submission, 25 September 2019
- AGLC
- 4 yearly review of modern awards–Payment of wages [2020] FWC 1205
- Case
- [2020] FWC 1205
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission had to address encompassed the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act in relation to the modern awards. Specifically, the focus was on whether the awards adequately covered the payment of wages, including termination payments, and if there were any discrepancies or omissions that needed rectification. The Commission needed to ensure that the awards reflected the current industrial landscape and provided adequate protections for employees.
The Commission examined the modern awards in detail, taking into account submissions from both parties. It found that there were certain inconsistencies and gaps in the awards concerning payment of wages and termination payments. The Commission concluded that the awards should be updated to provide clearer and more comprehensive provisions on these matters. Consequently, the Commission issued revised modern awards, which included detailed provisions on the payment of wages and termination payments, aiming to address the identified issues and provide better protections for employees. The final orders mandated the adoption of the revised awards, effective from a specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.