4 yearly review of modern awards - Pastoral Award 2010

Case [2017] FWC 6871


[2017] FWC 6871
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT AND DIRECTIONS


Fair Work Act 2009

s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards

4 yearly review of modern awards—Pastoral Award 2010
(AM2014/239)

Agricultural industry

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

MELBOURNE, 20 DECEMBER 2017

4 yearly review of modern awards - Pastoral Award 2010.

[1] This Statement deals with a small number of outstanding issues relating to the Pastoral Industry Award 2010. The issues were substantially dealt with in decisions issued on 6 July 2017 1 (the July decision) and 30 October 20172 (the October decision).

[2] In the July and the October decisions the Full Bench expressed a number of provisional views which, following the October decision, were incorporated into a revised version of the exposure draft. The Full Bench noted it had not reached a concluded view in respect of these matters and parties were provided an opportunity to make further submissions and submissions in reply in relation to the provisional views.

[3] One submission from the National Farmers Federation (NFF) was received in response to the provisional views. 3

[4] If any party wishes to file a brief written submission relating to any provisional view they are to do so by no later than 4.00 pm on Friday 2 February 2018.

[5] These issues will be the subject of a conference to be held in Sydney at 9.30 am on Friday 9 February 2018.

Outstanding issue relating to meal breaks and allowances

[6] In the October decision, it was noted that a separate Full Bench would be constituted to hear and determine an issue that has arisen regarding the operation and interaction of clauses 17.2(c)(ii) and 36.10 of the current award. 4 These clauses relate to overtime and meal breaks for piggery attendants. It was noted in the October decision that the operation and interaction of these clauses is ambiguous and need to be reviewed before the Commission can be satisfied that the relevant terms achieve the modern awards objective. It was also noted that there is no consensus between the parties about the intended operation of the clauses. The Full Bench outlined that the issues raised go well beyond what may be characterised as technical and drafting issues.5

[7] Prior to a separate Full Bench being constituted in this matter, interested parties are directed to hold discussions among themselves with a view to reaching a joint position about how the matter should be addressed. The interested parties are to file a short joint submission and draft directions by no later than 4.00 pm on Friday 2 February 2018.

[8] This issue will be discussed at the conference at 9.30 am on Friday 9 February 2018.

Outstanding issue relating to the ‘continuous work’ provisions

[9] In the October decision, the Full Bench highlighted two outstanding issues relating to ‘continuous work’ provisions. The first issue relates to a definition that was inserted at clause 31.1 of the exposure draft regarding non-continuous work. The second related issue concerns a proposal to amend footnotes in clause B.4.2 and B.4.5. These matters are dealt with at paragraphs [326]-[340] of the October decision. 6

[10] These issues will also be discussed at the conference to be held at 9.30 am on Friday 9 February 2018. Prior to this conference the interested parties are to:

(i) Hold discussions among themselves with the objective of coming to an agreed position about the resolution of the issue; and

(ii) File a joint proposal no later than 4.00 pm on Friday 2 February 2018. The joint proposal will be discussed and finalised at the conference held at 9.30 am on Friday 9 February 2018.

[11] All written material to be filed prior to the conference should be sent to amod@fwc.gov.au.

PRESIDENT

 1   [2017] FWCFB 3433.

 2   [2017] FWCFB 5536.

 3   Submission of the National Farmers Federation, 20 November 2017.

 4   See [2017] FWCFB 5536 at [285] – [292].

 5   See [2017] FWCFB 5536 at [292].

 6   See [2017] FWCFB 5536 at [326] – [340].

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR598905>

Details
AGLC
4 yearly review of modern awards - Pastoral Award 2010 [2017] FWC 6871
Case
[2017] FWC 6871
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves the 4 yearly review of the Pastoral Award 2010, overseen by the Fair Work Commission. The Commission was tasked with examining a number of outstanding issues that had not been fully resolved in prior decisions, particularly those related to meal breaks and allowances, as well as the 'continuous work' provisions within the award. The review aimed to ensure that the award met the modern awards objectives and addressed ambiguities identified in previous proceedings.

The primary legal issues before the Court were the interpretation and interaction of specific clauses within the award. These included the operation and interaction of clauses 17.2(c)(ii) and 36.10, which pertain to overtime and meal breaks for piggery attendants, and the definition of non-continuous work inserted at clause 31.1. The Court was also required to consider a proposal to amend footnotes in clauses B.4.2 and B.4.5, as these clauses relate to the 'continuous work' provisions. The overarching objective was to resolve these issues in a manner that aligns with the modern awards objectives and addresses the ambiguity and lack of consensus among the parties.

In addressing these issues, the Commission directed the interested parties to engage in discussions aimed at reaching a joint position and submitting a draft proposal by a specified deadline. The Court emphasised the importance of collaborative efforts among the parties to clarify the ambiguous provisions and to ensure that the award achieves its intended objectives. The Court scheduled a conference to further discuss and finalise the proposals, ensuring that all parties had an opportunity to present their views and negotiate the terms of the award.

The final orders included the directive for interested parties to submit their joint proposals by the deadline and the scheduling of a conference to discuss and finalise these proposals. The Court's approach was aimed at fostering a collaborative resolution to the outstanding issues, ensuring that the Pastoral Award 2010 meets the modern awards objectives and resolves ambiguities in a manner that is fair and effective for all parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.