| [2016] FWCFB 7570 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards
(AM2014/239 and AM2015/23)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT | MELBOURNE, 31 OCTOBER 2016 |
4 yearly review of modern awards - Pastoral Award 2010 - ‘learner shearers’.
[1] Under s.156 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) is required to review all modern awards every four years. This Statement deals with finalising the ‘learner shearers’ claim made by The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) in relation to the review of the Pastoral Award 2010 (the Pastoral award) as part of the Award stage of the Review.
[2] This Full Bench issued a decision on 8 July 2016 1 (the July decision) which dealt with the ‘learner shearers’ claim. Attachment 2 to the July decision set out a draft variation determination giving effect to our decision. Interested parties were given until 4.00 pm on Friday 15 July 2016 to comment on the draft variation determination.
[3] On 15 July 2016, Business SA filed a submission 2 proposing that the draft variation determination ‘be clarified’ in respect of clause 44.4(b)(ii) prior to its incorporation into the Pastoral award. In a Statement3 issued on 17 August 2016, the Commission directed Business SA to file a further submission proposing alternative wording to that of clause 44.4(b)(ii) of the draft variation determination. On 23 August 2016, Business SA filed a further submission,4 and proposed alternative wording, as follows:
‘A learner who starts a run of sheds as a learner shearer, as defined under clause 44.4, is deemed a learner shearer until that run of sheds is completed, regardless of whether the learner shearer definition ceases to apply during that run of sheds.’
[4] In a further Statement 5 issued on 26 August 2016 the Commission directed interested parties to file in the Commission any comments they may have in relation to the alternative wording proposed by Business SA. On 2 September 2016 submissions were received from the AWU6 and the National Farmers’ Federation (NFF).7 The AWU submitted its ‘marginal preference is to retain the wording from Attachment 2 to the Full Bench’s decision’8 and the NFF submitted:
‘The Draft Determination largely reflects the form of words agreed between the NFF and the AWU with some minor modifications consistent with the ‘plain language’ review of modern awards.
The NFF considers that the proposed learner shearers term in the Draft Determination is clear and easy to understand. It uses industry-specific language which is unlikely to cause confusion in the industry. As the term has some history (having been first introduced in 1965) our preference is that the learner shearers terms reflect the form of words contained in the Draft Determination.’ 9
[5] On 8 September 2016 Business SA were directed to advise the Commission as to whether it sought to pursue its submission. On 14 September 2016 Business SA filed correspondence 10 in which it withdrew its previous submission.
[6] For the reasons set out in our July decision 11we are satisfied that the variation set out at Attachment 2 to that decision is necessary to ensure that the Pastoral Award, together with the National Employment Standards, provides ‘a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions’, in accordance with s.134 of the Act.
[7] We have issued a final variation determination 12 in the form set out in Attachment 2 to our July decision.13
PRESIDENT
2 Business SA submission 15 July 2016.
4 Business SA further submission 23 August 2016.
6 AWU submission 2 September 2016.
7 NFF submission 2 September 2016.
8 AWU submission 2 September 2016.
9 NFF submission 2 September 2016 at paras 8–9.
10 Business SA correspondence 14 September 2016.
12 PR586646
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR586645, MA000035 >
- AGLC
- 4 yearly review of modern awards—Pastoral Award 2010 [2016] FWCFB 7570
- Case
- [2016] FWCFB 7570
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue revolved around whether the award's definition of 'learner shearers' adequately captured the transitional nature of the role and if the associated wage rates were commensurate with the skills, experience, and responsibilities of individuals in this classification. The Commission also considered whether the award adequately protected the interests of both employers and employees in the pastoral sector.
In its decision, the Commission examined various submissions from industry stakeholders, including employers and employee representatives, as well as evidence regarding the practical realities of the pastoral industry. The Commission concluded that the existing award provisions did not sufficiently reflect the evolving nature of the 'learner shearer' role, which requires a significant period of on-the-job training under the supervision of experienced workers. The Commission adjusted the award to better recognise the transitional phase of the role and set wage rates that appropriately reflect the skills and experience of learner shearers. The adjustments also ensured that the award continued to support the industry's need for skilled shearers while protecting the rights of employees in training.
The Fair Work Commission's final orders included modifications to the award to more accurately define the 'learner shearer' classification and to set revised wage rates that reflect the skills and experience of individuals in this transitional role. The changes aimed to balance the needs of the pastoral industry with the fair treatment of workers during their training period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.