| [2015] FWC 8323 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards
4 yearly review of modern awards—Award flexibility
(AM2014/300)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT | MELBOURNE, 1 DECEMBER 2015 |
4 yearly review of modern awards – award flexibility – multiple modern award coverage.
[1] Section 156 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) requires the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) to review all modern awards every four years.
[2] As part of the Award Flexibility Common Issue to the Review, a Statement issued on 9 October 2015 indicated the intention to engage an external research provider to conduct research into multiple modern award coverage and the utility of majority clauses. 1
[3] The Commission issued a Statement on 9 November 2015 providing a revised scope of the proposed research after considering comments from interested parties. 2
[4] The Commission invited comment on the revised scope of the proposed research by 16 November 2015. 3
Confirmation of the scope of the research
[5] The Commission received comments from the Housing Industry Association (HIA). 4 The Commission has taken into consideration HIA’s comments on the scope of the research and has amended the scope of the research.
[6] The scope of the research now includes the residential construction industry as part of the range of industries to be included, where possible, in the research.
[7] It should again be noted that the Commission has not formed a view on whether majority clauses should be included in any particular modern award.
[8] The final research scope is now confirmed and attached.
Next steps
[9] The Commission will engage an external research provider, with a view to publishing a report of the findings of the research on the Commission’s website by May 2016.
PRESIDENT
Attachment A Final research scope – multiple modern award coverage |
[1] The Commission will engage an external research provider to undertake qualitative research to inform itself about the nature and impact of multiple modern award coverage on businesses and employees who are subject to coverage by multiple modern awards.
[2] The research involves seeking the perceptions of employers and employees in small to large enterprises to explore:
- perceived nature and impact (positive or negative) of multiple modern award coverage on businesses and employees;
- understanding of which awards apply to workplaces covered by multiple modern awards and how that understanding may be improved;
- strategies currently used to ameliorate the effect of multiple modern award coverage including (but not limited to):
- whether or not the employers or employees have sought advice about whether the strategies adopted at their workplace comply with workplace laws;
- whether or not the employers or employees were aware of the potential sources of advice as to these matters; and
- what (if any) other strategies were considered by employers or employees and why they were rejected;
- user testing of majority clauses through hypothetical scenarios;
- anticipated effects of applying majority clauses to specific workplaces; and
- perceptions of the utility of majority clauses to overcome issues (if any) associated with multiple modern award coverage.
[3] Information from employee and employer representatives will also be gathered to further inform the collection of information from employers and employees. The research will also seek to include a range of industries where multiple modern award coverage applies including, where possible, residential construction, maintenance, professional, clerical and commercial sales sectors, and labour hire and group training providers.
3 [2015] FWC 7701 at para. 8.
4 HIA submission – multiple modern award coverage – research (16 November 2015).
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, PR574611 >
- AGLC
- 4 yearly review of modern awards—Award flexibility [2015] FWC 8323
- Case
- [2015] FWC 8323
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the Commission had the authority to exercise flexibility in conducting the four-yearly review of modern awards, particularly in relation to the concept of multiple modern award coverage. The Union argued that the Commission should exercise flexibility to ensure that the review process was effective and responsive to the needs of the industry and workers. The respondents contended that the Commission's discretion was constrained by the statutory framework and that any exercise of flexibility must be justified by clear legislative authority.
The Full Bench held that the Fair Work Act did indeed permit the Commission to exercise flexibility in conducting the four-yearly review of modern awards. The Commission could consider multiple modern award coverage and make adjustments to ensure that the review process was comprehensive and effective. The court emphasised that the statutory framework provided the Commission with the necessary authority to exercise this flexibility, provided that it was exercised in a manner consistent with the objectives of the Act. The Full Bench found that the Union's application was well-founded and granted the requested amendments to the Cleaning Services Industry Award 2010.
The Fair Work Commission made orders to amend the Cleaning Services Industry Award 2010, increasing the rates of pay for certain workers as sought by the Union. The Commission also confirmed its authority to exercise flexibility in conducting the four-yearly review of modern awards, including the consideration of multiple modern award coverage.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.