2308902 (Refugee)
[2023] AATA 3373
•12 September 2023
2308902 (Refugee) [2023] AATA 3373 (12 September 2023)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
CASE NUMBER: 2308902
MEMBER:Alan McMurran
DATE:12 September 2023
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 12 September 2023 at 3:24pm
CATCHWORDS
REFUGEE – protection visa – Malaysia – previous application for review finalised – no longer reviewable decision – no response to tribunal’s invitation to comment – no jurisdictionLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65CASES
Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependants.
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application lodged for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection on 13 September 2017 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 20 June 2023. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
An application for review of the same delegate’s decision was previously made to the Tribunal. The Tribunal made a decision on that application on 17 May 2023. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision: SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164 at [41] and the cases cited therein.
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review a delegate’s decision twice: Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301 and SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771.
The Tribunal sent a natural justice letter to the applicant on 23 June 2023, providing particulars that “the Tribunal made a decision on that application on 17 May 2023. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision.” The letter invited comments in writing on or before 7 July 2023. The applicant did not reply.
As the delegate’s decision has already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal, it is no longer a reviewable decision. Accordingly, the Tribunal no longer has jurisdiction in relation to that decision.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Alan McMurran
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Res Judicata
0
3
0