2308902 (Refugee)

Case [2023] AATA 3373


2308902 (Refugee) [2023] AATA 3373 (12 September 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  2308902

MEMBER:Alan McMurran

DATE:12 September 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Statement made on 12 September 2023 at 3:24pm

CATCHWORDS
REFUGEE – protection visa – Malaysia – previous application for review finalised – no longer reviewable decision – no response to tribunal’s invitation to comment – no jurisdiction

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65

CASES
Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164

Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependants.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application lodged for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection on 13 September 2017 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 20 June 2023. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.

  3. An application for review of the same delegate’s decision was previously made to the Tribunal. The Tribunal made a decision on that application on 17 May 2023. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision: SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164 at [41] and the cases cited therein.

  4. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review a delegate’s decision twice: Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301 and SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771.

  5. The Tribunal sent a natural justice letter to the applicant on 23 June 2023, providing particulars that “the Tribunal made a decision on that application on 17 May 2023. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision.” The letter invited comments in writing on or before 7 July 2023. The applicant did not reply.

  6. As the delegate’s decision has already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal, it is no longer a reviewable decision. Accordingly, the Tribunal no longer has jurisdiction in relation to that decision.

    DECISION

  7. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

    Alan McMurran
    Member


Details
AGLC
2308902 (Refugee) [2023] AATA 3373
Case
[2023] AATA 3373
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant sought review of a delegate's decision concerning a protection visa application. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) had previously conducted a review of the delegate's decision. The applicant was invited by the Tribunal to provide comments regarding the delegate's decision, but no response was received.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision, given that the decision had already been the subject of a prior review by the Tribunal.

The Tribunal reasoned that once a decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a reviewable decision. Consequently, the Tribunal's jurisdiction in relation to that specific decision is extinguished. As the delegate's decision in this matter had already undergone a valid review, the Tribunal concluded it lacked jurisdiction.

The Tribunal ordered that it does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

As the delegate’s decision has already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal, it is no longer a reviewable decision. Accordingly, the Tribunal no longer has jurisdiction in relation to that decision.DECISION The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.Alan McMurranMember

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.