2211866 (Refugee)
[2022] AATA 4977
•5 December 2022
2211866 (Refugee) [2022] AATA 4977 (5 December 2022)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
CASE NUMBER: 2211866
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: China
MEMBER:Russell Matheson
DATE:5 December 2022
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 05 December 2022 at 8:14pm
CATCHWORDS
REFUGEE – Protection Visa – China – applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements– application lodged out of time – no jurisdictionLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 494C
Migration Regulations 1994, r 4.31Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.
statement of decision and reasons
application for review
This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 14 November 2019 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 15 August 2022. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: reg 4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).
The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 14 November 2019 and dispatched by email. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.
On 16 August 2011, the applicant was invited to comment on the validity of the application for review and to do so, in writing by, 30 August 2022. To date, the applicant has not responded to the invitation regarding the validity of the application.
The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 14 November 2019 in accordance with s 494C of the Act. Therefore, the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 11 December 2019.
As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 15 August 2022 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.
decision
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Russell Matheson
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0