2209804 (Refugee)
Case
•
[2022] AATA 4131
•18 October 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
2209804 (Refugee) [2022] AATA 4131
[2022] AATA 4131
18 October 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant sought review of a decision concerning a protection visa application, with the review application being lodged with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal out of time. The dispute centred on whether the Tribunal possessed jurisdiction to hear the application given its late lodgement.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it had jurisdiction to consider the merits review application, which was received by the Tribunal on 5 July 2022, after the statutory deadline for making such an application had passed.
The Tribunal, constituted by Mr S Norman, Member, determined that the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions due to its late lodgement. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. The decision was that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it had jurisdiction to consider the merits review application, which was received by the Tribunal on 5 July 2022, after the statutory deadline for making such an application had passed.
The Tribunal, constituted by Mr S Norman, Member, determined that the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions due to its late lodgement. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. The decision was that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
2209804 (Refugee) [2022] AATA 4131
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
DZAFH v Minister for Immigration
[2017] FCCA 387
DFQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2019] FCAFC 64
DFQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2019] FCAFC 64