2107034 (Refugee)
[2021] AATA 3389
•5 July 2021
2107034 (Refugee) [2021] AATA 3389 (5 July 2021)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
CASE NUMBER: 2107034
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Malaysia
MEMBER:Tim Connellan
DATE:5 July 2021
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 05 July 2021 at 11:18am
CATCHWORDS
REFUGEE – protection visa – Malaysia – application made more than 28 days after notification of visa refusal – No jurisdictionLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 494C
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 4.31Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 26 April 2021 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 25 May 2021. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994.
The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 26 April 2021 and dispatched by email. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.
The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 26 April 2021 pursuant to s.494C of the Act, therefore the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 23 May 2021.
As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 25 May 2021 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Tim Connellan
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0