2013055 (Refugee)

[2020] AATA 5284

2013055 (Refugee) [2020] AATA 5284 (27 November 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  2013055

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                   Malaysia

MEMBER:Hugh Sanderson

DATE:27 November 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Statement made on 27 November 2020 at 12:05pm

CATCHWORDS
REFUGEE – protection visa – Malaysia – review application out of time – No jurisdiction

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 494C
Migration Regulations 1994, r 4.31

CASES
DZAFH v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCCA 387

Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 24 October 2018 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 20 August 2020. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.

2. As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994.

3. The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 23 May 2020 and dispatched by email. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.

4. The Tribunal wrote to the applicant on 29 September 2020 as follows:

   It appears that your application is not a valid application as it was not lodged within the relevant time limit. Pursuant to r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994, the period in which an application for review of a Part 7-reviewable decision must be given to the Tribunal is 28 days, commencing on the day the applicant is notified of the decision. In DZAFH v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCCA 387, the Federal Circuit Court held that the prescribed period in r.4.31 commences on, and includes, the day the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision: at [44] – [46].

   The primary decision was emailed to you on 23 May 2020 meaning that 23 May 2020 was the date on which you are taken to have been notified. In accordance with DZAFH, the last day for lodging the application for review was 19 June 2020. As the application was not received until 20 August 2020, it appears to be out of time. However, this is a matter which must be determined by a Member.

5. The applicant was advised that he was required to respond to this information by 30 October 2020. At the time of this decision, the applicant has not provided any response to the Tribunal.

6. The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 23 May 2020: s.494C of the Act. Therefore, the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 19 June 2020.

7. As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 20 August 2020 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.

   DECISION

8. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

   Hugh Sanderson
   Member