1830811 (Refugee)

Case

[2018] AATA 5671

20 December 2018


1830811 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 5671 (20 December 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1830811

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                  Malaysia

MEMBER:David McCulloch

DATE:20 December 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Perth

DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Statement made on 20 December 2018 at 9:15am

CATCHWORDS
REFUGEE – protection visa – Malaysia – no response to Tribunal – applicant correctly notified – no jurisdiction

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 494C

Migration Regulations 1994, r 4.31




Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 1 November 2017 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 21 October 2018. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.

  2. As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994.

  3. The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 1 November 2017 and dispatched by email.

  4. The Tribunal wrote to the applicant on 31 October 2018 indicating that records indicate that the primary decision was emailed to the applicant on 1 November 2017 meaning that 1 November 2017 was the date on which she was taken to have been notified. On that basis, the last day for lodging the application for review was 28 November 2017. As the application was not received until 21 October 2018, it appears to be out of time.

  5. The applicant was given the opportunity to respond to this preliminary view of the Tribunal. No response was received by the applicant.

  6. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.

  7. The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 1 November 2017: s.494C of the Act. Therefore the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 28 November 2017.

  8. As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 21 October 2018 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.

    DECISION

  9. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

    David McCulloch
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0