1817683 (Refugee)

Case

[2021] AATA 4553

30 September 2021


1817683 (Refugee) [2021] AATA 4553 (30 September 2021)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1817683

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                   Malaysia

MEMBER:Joseph Lindsay

DATE:30 September 2021

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 30 September 2021 at 2:44pm

CATCHWORDS

REFUGEE – protection visa – Malaysia – dismissal decision – failure to attend Tribunal hearing – decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, ss 426A, 426B

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 15 June 2018 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a protection visa under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. On 15 September 2021 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s 426A(1A)(b) of the Act as the applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

  3. The applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s 426B(5). The applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

  4. As the applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

    Joseph Lindsay
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Jurisdiction

  • Natural Justice

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0