1811104 (Refugee)
[2018] AATA 2276
•31 May 2018
1811104 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 2276 (31 May 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
CASE NUMBER: 1811104
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Malaysia
MEMBER:Paul Millar
DATE:31 May 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 31 May 2018 at 12:43pm
CATCHWORDS
Refugee – Protection visa – Malaysia – Review application out of timeLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 431Migration Regulations 1994, r 4.31
Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 26 July 2016 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 19 April 2018. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994.
The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 26 July 2016 and dispatched by post. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements. The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 4 August 2016. Therefore the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 31 August 2016.
As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 19 April 2018 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Paul Millar
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0