1806544 (Refugee)
[2018] AATA 1521
•10 April 2018
1806544 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 1521 (10 April 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
CASE NUMBER: 1806544
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Malaysia
MEMBER:Sean Baker
DATE:10 April 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 10 April 2018 at 2:50pm
CATCHWORDS
Refugee – Protection Visa – Malaysia – Notified in accordance with statutory requirements – No response received by the Tribunal
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s.65
Migration Regulations 1994 r 4.31(2)
Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 25 August 2017 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 12 March 2018. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994.
The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 25 August 2017 and dispatched by email. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.
The Tribunal wrote to the applicant seeking her comments. She did not respond.
The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 25 August 2017: s.494C of the Act. Therefore the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 21 September 2017.
As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 12 March 2018 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Sean Baker
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0