1804485 (Refugee)

[2018] AATA 919

1804485 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 919 (9 March 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1804485

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                  Malaysia

MEMBER:Jason Pennell

DATE:9 March 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Statement made on 9 March 2018 at 12.48pm

CATCHWORDS
Refugee – Protection visa – Malaysia – Applicant notified of the decision – No jurisdiction to review the application

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 rr 2.55, 4.31 Schedule 2

Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on [date] January 2018 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 20 February 2018. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.

2. As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day.[1]

   [1] r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994

3. The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated 22 January 2018 and dispatched by email. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.

4. The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on 22 January 2018.[2] Therefore the prescribed period to apply for review ended on 18 February 2018.

   [2] s.494C of the Act or r.2.55 of the Regulations

5. By a letter dated 21 February 2018 the Tribunal advised the applicant that her application was not valid as it was not lodged within the relevant time limit. The Tribunal invited the applicant to make any comment in writing on whether a valid application had been made by 7 March 2018. The Tribunal has not received any correspondence in reply to its letter.

6. As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 20 February 2018 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.

   DECISION

7. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

   Jason Pennell
   Member