1725480 (Refugee)
[2017] AATA 2926
•28 November 2017
1725480 (Refugee) [2017] AATA 2926 (28 November 2017)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
CASE NUMBER: 1725480
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Malaysia
MEMBER:Nathan Goetz
DATE:28 November 2017
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 28 November 2017 at 1:00pm
CATCHWORDS
Refugee – Protection visa – Malaysia – Requirement to lodge application within 28 days of decision – Notification of decision – Applicant taken to be notified – Application not received in time
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 494CMigration Regulations 1994, r 4.31
Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made on [date] March 2017 by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 19 October 2017. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
As the applicant was not in immigration detention on the day the applicant was notified of the decision, an application for review of the decision had to be made within 28 days, commencing on that day: r.4.31(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994.
The material before the Tribunal indicates that the applicant was notified of the decision by letter dated [date] March 2017 and dispatched by email. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was notified of the decision in accordance with the statutory requirements.
The Tribunal finds that the applicant is taken to have been notified of the decision on [date] March 2017: s.494C of the Act. Therefore the prescribed period to apply for review ended on [date] April 2017. As the application for review was not received by the Tribunal until 19 October 2017 the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Nathan Goetz
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0