1718286 (Refugee)

[2017] AATA 1611

1718286 (Refugee) [2017] AATA 1611 (28 August 2017)

CORRIGENDUM

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1718286

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                  Malaysia

MEMBER:Fiona Meagher

DATE OF DECISION:  28 August 2017

DATE CORRIGENDUM

SIGNED:21 September 2017

PLACE OF DECISION:  Brisbane

AMENDMENT:  The following corrections are made to the decision:

The ‘COUNTRY OF REFERENCE’ paragraph, with the country of reference being Malaysia, is missing from the original Decision record. This paragraph should be inserted as the fifth paragraph into the Decision record cover page under the ‘DIBP REFERENCE(S)’ paragraph.

Fiona Meagher
Member

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1718286

MEMBER:Fiona Meagher

DATE:28 August 2017

PLACE OF DECISION:  Brisbane

DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Statement made on 28 August 2017 at 7:19pm

CATCHWORDS
Refugee – Protection visa – Malaysia – No Jurisdiction– Non reviewable decision – Repeat application   

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65

CASES
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164
Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771

Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration [in] March 2017 to refuse to grant a protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 17 August 2017. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.

3. An application for review of the same delegate’s decision was previously made to the Tribunal. The Tribunal made a decision on that application on 17 July 2017. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision: SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164 at [41] and the cases cited therein. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review a delegate’s decision twice: Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301 and SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771.

4. As the delegate’s decision has already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal, it is no longer a reviewable decision. Accordingly, the Tribunal no longer has jurisdiction in relation to that decision.

   DECISION

5. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

   Fiona Meagher
   Member