1622210 (Refugee)

[2020] AATA 80

1622210 (Refugee) [2020] AATA 80 (13 January 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1622210

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                   Thailand

MEMBER:Meena Sripathy

DATE:13 January 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 13 January 2020 at 11:15am

CATCHWORDS

REFUGEE – Protection visa – Thailand – applicant failed to attend tribunal hearing – failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period – decision to dismiss the application confirmed

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, s 426

Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 25 November 2016 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a protection visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. On 9 December 2019 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.426A(1A)(b) of the Act as the applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

3. The applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.426B(5). The applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

4. As the applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

   DECISION

5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

   Meena Sripathy
   Member