1612887 (Refugee)

Case

[2018] AATA 2874

24 April 2018


1612887 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 2874 (24 April 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

CASE NUMBER:  1612887

COUNTRY OF REFERENCE:                  Vietnam

MEMBER:Christopher Smolicz

DATE:24 April 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Adelaide

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 24 April 2018 at 9:25am

CATCHWORDS
 Refugee – Protection visa – Vietnam – Applicant did not appear – Application dismissed

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 426A, 426B

Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant.

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 20 July 2016 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a protection visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. On 27 March 2018 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.426A(1A)(b) of the Act as the applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

  3. The applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.426B(5). The applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

  4. As the applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

    Christopher Smolicz
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Jurisdiction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0