1608592 (Migration)

Case

[2016] AATA 4316

5 September 2016


1608592 (Migration) [2016] AATA 4316 (5 September 2016)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr RAMANDEEP SINGH

CASE NUMBER:  1608592

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2016/1758041

MEMBER:Katie Malyon

DATE:5 September 2016

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 05 September 2016 at 8:45am

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 7 June 2016 to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 457 Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. On 4 August 2016 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

  3. The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5) of the Act. The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

  4. As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

    Katie Malyon


    Member

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Jurisdiction

  • Natural Justice

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0