1514822 (Migration)

Case

[2016] AATA 4717

28 November 2016


1514822 (Migration) [2016] AATA 4717 (28 November 2016)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Kamaldeep Sharma

CASE NUMBER:  1514822

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2015/1620127

MEMBER:Rania Skaros

DATE:28 November 2016

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 28 November 2016 at 10:18am

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 5 June 2015 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Skilled (Residence) (Class VB) Subclass 887 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. On 10 November 2016 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

  3. The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

  4. As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

    Rania Skaros
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Jurisdiction

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0