1510018 (Migration)

Case

[2016] AATA 3090

7 January 2016


1510018 (Migration) [2016] AATA 3090 (7 January 2016)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANTS:  Mrs Shabnam Shariq
Mr Shariq HUSAIN
Master Safwan SHARIQ

CASE NUMBER:  1510018

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  DBV1506431

MEMBER:Tim Connellan

DATE:7 January 2016

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

Statement made on 07 January 2016 at 3:59pm

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. An application has been lodged for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration, dated 18 July 2015, to refuse to grant Visitor (Class FA) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). This decision is reviewable under s.338(7) of the Act.

  2. The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 24 July 2015. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the decision as the application was not made in accordance with the relevant legislation.

  3. Section 347(2) of the Act specifies who has the right to apply for review of a decision that is reviewable under Part 5 of the Act. In the case of a decision described in s.338(7), an application for review may only be made by the relative referred to in the subsection concerned: s.347(2)(c).

  4. As the decision that is the subject of the review application is a decision covered by s.338(7), the application for review could only be made by the relative referred to in that subsection. In the present case, the review application was made by Ms Shabnam Shariq who was the primary visa applicant. As such, the application for review is not an application properly made under s.347 and it follows that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.

    Tim Connellan
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0