1416744 (Migration) [2015] AATA 3882 (17 December 2015)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Rana Muhammad Qasim
CASE NUMBER: 1416744
DIBP REFERENCE(S): CLF2014/104753
MEMBER:David Dobell
DATE:17 December 2015
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision of the Department to not grant the visa applicant a Distinguished Talent (Residence) (Class BX) Subclass 858 visa
Statement made on 17 December 2015 at 9:21am
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 26 September 2014 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Distinguished Talent (Residence) (Class BX) Subclass 858 visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The visa applicant applied for the visa on 30 July 2014. The delegate refused to grant the visa on the basis that cl.858.212 was not satisfied.
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 26 November 2015 at a hearing to give evidence and present arguments.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision under review should be affirmed.
CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
On the Department file is the Form 47SV visa application and a Nomination Form 1000, dated 15 July 2014 and signed by Rajeev Arora.
As to his qualifications, awards and references (Q.77) the applicant stated as follows:
·Qualification/award/reference: FIA/ACCA/EDEXCEL completed more than 60 professional units within 2.5 years at youngest age of 19
·Institution/name of referee: SQA (Scottish qualification authority), BIMS, Edexcel
·From: 8/2010 to 08/2013
·Qualification/award/reference: Edexcel post graduation level award and Exemptions in ICAEW also known as Mother of Accounting
·Institution/name of referee: BIMS, ACCA (Association of chartered certified accounts), ICAEW (Institute of CA England and Wales)
·From: 8/2010 to 06/2014
·Qualification/award/reference: Youngest accountant eligible for PhD research program (in Business and finance in age of 19 under IQN
·Institution/name of referee: IQN ( international qualification network), NUML University,
·From: [unstated] to 06/2014
·Qualification/award/reference: Honoured of 35 months of internship awarded which is then approved by ACCA/recently awarded honors covered by international media group
·Institution/name of referee: Pakistan observer newspaper, [unstated] to 06/2014
The applicant attached the following statement of purpose to the visa application:
(SOP) Statement of purpose
As already detailed I am Rana Muhammad Qasim just not only a youngest qualified accountant with age of 19 but also one who achieved many milestones on extra ordinary performance in my profession till now age of 19.I am applying for 858 distinguish talent visa which itself an honour if approved, with all option in front of me including skilled points migration, I preferred to go for 858 visa due to my distinguish achievements and passion towards my profession and other factor as in Australia in my case to be eligible for points system residence I have to wait 6 year till 25 to get enough age points.
My extraordinary performance and love towards my profession made…
Continue reading 1416744 (Migration)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- 1416744 (Migration) [2015] AATA 3882
- Case
- [2015] AATA 3882
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant had achieved exceptional and outstanding success in a professional field, such as accounting, that was internationally recognised. This involved assessing the credentials, achievements, and international recognition of the applicant's professional accomplishments. Specifically, the Tribunal needed to determine if the applicant's achievements were of a calibre that would be acclaimed as exceptional and outstanding not only in their home country but also internationally, and if they placed the applicant at the very top of their profession.
In reaching its decision, the Tribunal considered the evidence provided by the applicant, including his educational qualifications, professional achievements, and the recognition he had received within his field. The Tribunal also evaluated the international standing of the applicant's achievements, ensuring they met the stringent criteria outlined in the Department's policy. Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that while the applicant had made notable achievements in his profession at a young age, these did not reach the level of exceptional and outstanding success required for a subclass 858 visa. The Tribunal found that the achievements, although commendable, did not demonstrate the level of international recognition and prominence necessary to satisfy the visa criteria.
As a result, the Tribunal affirmed the Department's decision not to grant the visa applicant a subclass 858 visa. The Tribunal's reasoning was based on the applicant's failure to meet the stringent criteria for exceptional and outstanding achievement in a profession that was internationally recognised. The Tribunal determined that the applicant's achievements, while impressive, did not place him at the top echelons of his field in an internationally recognised manner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.