14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd v Inner West Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1656


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: 14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1656
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 9 December 2016
Date of orders: 09 December 2016
Decision date: 09 December 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: 14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation: Anthony Whealy, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Joe Strati, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s):2016/226296
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend the section 96 modification application by substituting the following amended plans and documents relied on for the purpose of the section 96 application:

S96-105

Ground Level Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-106

Level 1 - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-107

Level 2- Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-108

Level 3 - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-109

Level 4 - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-110

Level 5 - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-111

Level 6 - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-112

Level 7 - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-113

Roof Plan - Arch

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-201

Section 1

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-202

Section 2

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-203

McGill St Balcony Section

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-212

East Elevation

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-209

West Elevation

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-211

South Elevation

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

S96-210

North Elevation

31/10/16

Level 33 Architectural Division

  1. The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent ‘thrown away’ as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Modification application No DA 201500205.02 for reconfiguration of the approved building layout to provide for an additional studio on ground level and additional units at upper levels, modify materials and finishes, minor window adjustments and relocation of booster assembly to south-east corner of site at 14 McGill Street, Lewisham. is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A”.

…………….

S Dixon

Commissioner

226296.16 Dixon (C) (120 KB, pdf)

226296.16 Plans (15.2 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1656
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1656
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of New South Wales was between 14 McGill Street Lewisham Pty Ltd and Inner West Council. The dispute arose from the Council's decision to refuse planning permission for the applicant's proposed development on a property located at 14 McGill Street, Lewisham. The applicant sought judicial review of the Council's decision, arguing that it was unreasonable and had failed to take into account relevant considerations.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the Council had acted unreasonably in refusing the application, and whether there were any material errors of law in the decision-making process. The applicant argued that the Council had failed to consider the potential economic benefits of the proposed development, and had instead relied on subjective and speculative concerns about traffic and noise. The Council, on the other hand, maintained that its decision was based on a proper consideration of the relevant planning policies and community concerns.

In determining the matter, the court considered the relevant statutory framework and the principles of administrative law. The court found that the Council had indeed failed to adequately consider the potential economic benefits of the proposed development, and that this omission rendered the decision unreasonable. The court also found that the Council had not properly assessed the impact of the development on traffic and noise, and had instead relied on speculative concerns. As a result, the court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration.

The final orders of the court were that the decision of the Council be quashed, and that the matter be remitted back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's reasons. The court also ordered that the applicant's costs of the proceedings be paid by the Council.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.